United States of America V. Somers
Author | : |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 94 |
Release | : 1990 |
Genre | : |
ISBN | : |
Download United States of America V. Somers Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download United States Of America V Somers PDF full book. Access full book title United States Of America V Somers.
Author | : |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 94 |
Release | : 1990 |
Genre | : |
ISBN | : |
Author | : |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 66 |
Release | : 1956 |
Genre | : |
ISBN | : |
Author | : |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 64 |
Release | : 1990 |
Genre | : |
ISBN | : |
Author | : |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 60 |
Release | : 1983 |
Genre | : |
ISBN | : |
Author | : |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 70 |
Release | : 1975 |
Genre | : |
ISBN | : |
Author | : |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 242 |
Release | : 1977 |
Genre | : |
ISBN | : |
Author | : |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 54 |
Release | : 1972 |
Genre | : |
ISBN | : |
Author | : |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 36 |
Release | : 1979 |
Genre | : |
ISBN | : |
Author | : Robert A. Katzmann |
Publisher | : Oxford University Press |
Total Pages | : 184 |
Release | : 2014-08-14 |
Genre | : Law |
ISBN | : 0199362149 |
In an ideal world, the laws of Congress--known as federal statutes--would always be clearly worded and easily understood by the judges tasked with interpreting them. But many laws feature ambiguous or even contradictory wording. How, then, should judges divine their meaning? Should they stick only to the text? To what degree, if any, should they consult aids beyond the statutes themselves? Are the purposes of lawmakers in writing law relevant? Some judges, such as Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, believe courts should look to the language of the statute and virtually nothing else. Chief Judge Robert A. Katzmann of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit respectfully disagrees. In Judging Statutes, Katzmann, who is a trained political scientist as well as a judge, argues that our constitutional system charges Congress with enacting laws; therefore, how Congress makes its purposes known through both the laws themselves and reliable accompanying materials should be respected. He looks at how the American government works, including how laws come to be and how various agencies construe legislation. He then explains the judicial process of interpreting and applying these laws through the demonstration of two interpretative approaches, purposivism (focusing on the purpose of a law) and textualism (focusing solely on the text of the written law). Katzmann draws from his experience to show how this process plays out in the real world, and concludes with some suggestions to promote understanding between the courts and Congress. When courts interpret the laws of Congress, they should be mindful of how Congress actually functions, how lawmakers signal the meaning of statutes, and what those legislators expect of courts construing their laws. The legislative record behind a law is in truth part of its foundation, and therefore merits consideration.
Author | : Alexander Slidell MacKenzie |
Publisher | : Franklin Classics Trade Press |
Total Pages | : 42 |
Release | : 2018-10-29 |
Genre | : |
ISBN | : 9780344459375 |
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. To ensure a quality reading experience, this work has been proofread and republished using a format that seamlessly blends the original graphical elements with text in an easy-to-read typeface. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.