Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Third Report Of Session 2013 14 PDF full book. Access full book title Third Report Of Session 2013 14.
| Author | : Great Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: European Scrutiny Committee |
| Publisher | : Stationery Office |
| Total Pages | : 164 |
| Release | : 2013-06-03 |
| Genre | : Political Science |
| ISBN | : 9780215058775 |
| Author | : Great Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: European Scrutiny Committee |
| Publisher | : The Stationery Office |
| Total Pages | : 96 |
| Release | : 2013-12-04 |
| Genre | : Political Science |
| ISBN | : 9780215064745 |
With correction slip dated December 2013
| Author | : Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons. European Scrutiny Committee |
| Publisher | : The Stationery Office |
| Total Pages | : 60 |
| Release | : 2014 |
| Genre | : Political Science |
| ISBN | : 0215081587 |
| Author | : Great Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: European Scrutiny Committee |
| Publisher | : Stationery Office |
| Total Pages | : 124 |
| Release | : 2013-07-18 |
| Genre | : Political Science |
| ISBN | : 9780215060853 |
| Author | : Great Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: European Scrutiny Committee |
| Publisher | : The Stationery Office |
| Total Pages | : 106 |
| Release | : 2013-03-11 |
| Genre | : Political Science |
| ISBN | : 9780215055170 |
| Author | : Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons. Select Committee on Science and Technology |
| Publisher | : The Stationery Office |
| Total Pages | : 73 |
| Release | : 2015 |
| Genre | : Political Science |
| ISBN | : 0215084225 |
| Author | : Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons. Select Committee on Science and Technology |
| Publisher | : The Stationery Office |
| Total Pages | : 52 |
| Release | : 2014-05-04 |
| Genre | : Political Science |
| ISBN | : 0215071840 |
The Government launched its new horizon scanning programme last July, stating that 'in a tight economic climate, it is more important than ever to have the best possible understanding of the world around us, and how that world is changing'. However, as it stands, the new programme is little more than an echo chamber for Government views. The new bodies that have been created consist entirely of Civil Servants, effectively excluding the vast pool of expertise that exists outside of government. The new programme does not even have a dedicated web presence to keep interested parties informed. The programme's failings are partially attributed to a lack of ministerial oversight. The Government also needs to recognise the potential role to be played in the new programme by the Government Office for Science (GO-Science), specifically the Foresight Unit. The relative lack of impact that the Foresight Unit has historically had on policy is largely a result of its non-central location in government. GO-Science is located in the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS). In contrast, the new horizon scanning programme is located in the Cabinet Office. In choosing to situate the new horizon scanning programme in the Cabinet Office, the Government has recognised the importance of location and has thereby acknowledged the strength of this argument. GO-Science should be relocated from BIS to the Cabinet Office, where it can play a more central role in the new programme and more effectively fulfill its role of ensuring that the best scientific evidence is utilised across government
| Author | : Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons. Foreign Affairs Committee |
| Publisher | : The Stationery Office |
| Total Pages | : 44 |
| Release | : 2015 |
| Genre | : Political Science |
| ISBN | : 0215081722 |
The cuts imposed on the FCO since 2010 have been severe and have gone beyond just trimming fat: capacity now appears to be being damaged. If further cuts are imposed, the UK's diplomatic imprint and influence would probably reduce, and the Government would need to roll back some of its foreign policy objectives. The FCO's budget is a tiny element of Government expenditure, but the FCO makes disproportionate contribution to policy making at the highest level, including decisions on whether to commit to military action. The next Government needs to protect future FCO budgets under the next Spending Review.
| Author | : Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons. Select Committee on Science and Technology |
| Publisher | : The Stationery Office |
| Total Pages | : 64 |
| Release | : 2014 |
| Genre | : Medical |
| ISBN | : 0215078535 |
The risks and benefits of participating in screening programmes, for conditions and diseases like cancer, are not consistently communicated by either the NHS or private health care providers, the Science and Technology Committee has warned in a new report. It is calling on the Government to ensure that a standardised process to produce screening information is introduced and that better communications training is provided to health care professionals. A recently revised breast cancer screening leaflet for the 50-70 age group - with its more explicit focus on helping women make an 'informed choice' about whether screening is right for them - marks a step in the right direction. However, the inquiry found that the principles followed to revise this leaflet have not been applied to the communications developed by other NHS screening programmes. The Committee recommends that steps are immediately taken by the Government's advisor on screening, the UK National Screening Committee (UK NSC), to devise and implement a standard process for producing information that facilitates informed choice. It also recommends a clarification of what 'informed choice' means for potential screening participants so that different screening programmes can be more effectively evaluated on their delivery of it. MPs are also calling on the Office for National Statistics to validate the statistics presented in NHS screening information to resolve disagreement and confusion over their accuracy.
| Author | : Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons. Select Committee on Science and Technology |
| Publisher | : The Stationery Office |
| Total Pages | : 242 |
| Release | : 2014-04-02 |
| Genre | : Science |
| ISBN | : 0215070623 |
The Government is failing to clearly and effectively communicate climate science to the public. There is little evidence of co-ordination amongst Government, government agencies and public bodies on communicating climate science, despite various policies at national and regional level to mitigate and adapt to climate change. The mandate to act on climate can only be maintained if the electorate are convinced that the Government is acting on the basis of strong scientific evidence. Ministers therefore need to do more to demonstrate that is the case and consistently reflect the Government approach in all their communications, especially with the media. The report also criticises the BBC for its reporting on the issue. It points out that BBC News teams continue to make mistakes in their coverage of climate science by giving opinions and scientific fact the same weight. The BBC is called to develop clear editorial guidelines for all commentators and presenters on the facts of climate that should be used to challenge statements, from either side of the climate policy debate, that stray too far from the scientific facts. It is important that climate science is presented separately from any subsequent policy response. Government should work with the learned societies and national academies to develop a source of information on climate science that is discrete from policy delivery, comprehensible to the general public and responsive to both current developments and uncertainties in the science
