The Politics Of Precedent On The Us Supreme Court PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download The Politics Of Precedent On The Us Supreme Court PDF full book. Access full book title The Politics Of Precedent On The Us Supreme Court.
Author | : Thomas G. Hansford |
Publisher | : Princeton University Press |
Total Pages | : 155 |
Release | : 2018-06-05 |
Genre | : Law |
ISBN | : 0691188041 |
Download The Politics of Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle
The Politics of Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court offers an insightful and provocative analysis of the Supreme Court's most important task--shaping the law. Thomas Hansford and James Spriggs analyze a key aspect of legal change: the Court's interpretation or treatment of the precedents it has set in the past. Court decisions do not just resolve immediate disputes; they also set broader precedent. The meaning and scope of a precedent, however, can change significantly as the Court revisits it in future cases. The authors contend that these interpretations are driven by an interaction between policy goals and variations in the legal authoritativeness of precedent. From this premise, they build an explanation of the legal interpretation of precedent that yields novel predictions about the nature and timing of legal change. Hansford and Spriggs test their hypotheses by examining how the Court has interpreted the precedents it set between 1946 and 1999. This analysis provides compelling support for their argument, and demonstrates that the justices' ideological goals and the role of precedent are inextricably linked. The two prevailing, yet contradictory, views of precedent--that it acts either solely as a constraint, or as a "cloak" that never actually influences the Court--are incorrect. This book shows that while precedent can operate as a constraint on the justices' decisions, it also represents an opportunity to foster preferred societal outcomes.
Author | : Christopher J. Peters |
Publisher | : Springer Science & Business Media |
Total Pages | : 233 |
Release | : 2014-02-11 |
Genre | : Law |
ISBN | : 9400779518 |
Download Precedent in the United States Supreme Court Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle
This volume presents a variety of both normative and descriptive perspectives on the use of precedent by the United States Supreme Court. It brings together a diverse group of American legal scholars, some of whom have been influenced by the Segal/Spaeth "attitudinal" model and some of whom have not. The group of contributors includes legal theorists and empiricists, constitutional lawyers and legal generalists, leading authorities and up-and-coming scholars. The book addresses questions such as how the Court establishes durable precedent, how the Court decides to overrule precedent, the effects of precedent on case selection, the scope of constitutional precedent, the influence of concurrences and dissents, and the normative foundations of constitutional precedent. Most of these questions have been addressed by the Court itself only obliquely, if at all. The volume will be valuable to readers both in the United States and abroad, particularly in light of ongoing debates over the role of precedent in civil-law nations and emerging legal systems.
Author | : Schultz, David |
Publisher | : Edward Elgar Publishing |
Total Pages | : 200 |
Release | : 2022-03-15 |
Genre | : Law |
ISBN | : 1839103132 |
Download Constitutional Precedent in US Supreme Court Reasoning Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle
Precedent is an important tool of judicial decision making and reasoning in common law systems such as the United States. Instead of having each court decide cases anew, the rule of precedent or stares decisis dictates that similar cases should be decided similarly. Adherence to precedent promotes several values, including stability, reliability, and uniformity, and it also serves to constrain judicial discretion. While adherence to precedent is important, there are some cases where the United States Supreme Court does not follow it when it comes to constitutional reasoning. Over time the US Supreme Court under its different Chief Justices has approached rejection of its own precedent in different ways and at varying rates of reversal. This book examines the role of constitutional precedent in US Supreme Court reasoning.
Author | : Michael P. Fix |
Publisher | : Cambridge University Press |
Total Pages | : 209 |
Release | : 2020-08-20 |
Genre | : Law |
ISBN | : 1108835635 |
Download US Supreme Court Doctrine in the State High Courts Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle
Presenting a new theoretical perspective, Fix and Kassow show how law and politics shape state high court use of Supreme Court precedent. This book approaches this complex topic in an accessible way that will appeal to anyone interested in law and politics or traditional approaches to legal decision-making.
Author | : Harold J. Spaeth |
Publisher | : Cambridge University Press |
Total Pages | : 342 |
Release | : 1999-03-28 |
Genre | : Political Science |
ISBN | : 9780521624244 |
Download Majority Rule or Minority Will Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle
This book examines the influence of precedent on the behavior of the US Supreme Court justices throughout the Court's history. Supreme Court justices almost always "follow" precedent, in that they always cite precedents for the positions they take. Because there are always precedents on either side of a case for justices to follow, following precedent does not mean that the justices are ever influenced by precedent. Employing the assumption that for precedent to be an influence on the behavior of justices, it must lead to a result they would not otherwise have reached, the authors show that precedent rarely controls the justices' votes.
Author | : Lief H. Carter |
Publisher | : University of Chicago Press |
Total Pages | : 311 |
Release | : 2016-03-04 |
Genre | : Political Science |
ISBN | : 022632821X |
Download Reason in Law Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle
Newly updated ninth edition: “A superbly written, pedagogically rich, historically and conceptually informed introduction to legal reasoning.” —Law and Politics Book Review Over the decades it has been in print, Reason in Law has established itself as the place to start for understanding legal reasoning, a critical component of the rule of law. This ninth edition brings the book’s analyses and examples up to date, adding new cases while retaining old ones whose lessons remain potent. It examines several recent controversial Supreme Court decisions, including rulings on the constitutionality and proper interpretation of the Affordable Care Act and Justice Scalia’s powerful dissent in Maryland v. King. Also new to this edition are cases on same-sex marriage, the Voting Rights Act, and the legalization of marijuana. A new appendix explains the historical evolution of legal reasoning and the rule of law in civic life. The result is an indispensable introduction to the workings of the law.
Author | : Ryan C. Black |
Publisher | : Cambridge University Press |
Total Pages | : 193 |
Release | : 2012-04-30 |
Genre | : Law |
ISBN | : 1107015294 |
Download The Solicitor General and the United States Supreme Court Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle
This book examines whether and how the Office of the Solicitor General influences the United States Supreme Court. Combining archival data with recent innovations in the areas of matching and causal inference, the book finds that the Solicitor General influences every aspect of the Court's decision making process.
Author | : David Schultz |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 0 |
Release | : 2023-03-28 |
Genre | : |
ISBN | : 9781035315567 |
Download Constitutional Precedent in Us Supreme Court Reasoning Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle
Precedent is an important tool of judicial decision making and reasoning in common law systems such as the United States. Instead of having each court decide cases anew, the rule of precedent or stares decisis dictates that similar cases should be decided similarly. Adherence to precedent promotes several values, including stability, reliability, and uniformity, and it also serves to constrain judicial discretion. Yet while adherence to precedent is important, there are some cases where the United States Supreme Court does not follow it when it comes to constitutional reasoning. Over time the US Supreme Court under its different Chief Justices has approached rejection of its own precedent in different ways and at varying rates of reversal. This book examines the role of constitutional precedent in US Supreme Court reasoning. The author surveys the entire history of the US Supreme Court up until 2020, keying in on decisions regarding when it chose to overturn its own constitutional precedent and why. He explores how the US Supreme Court under its different Chief Justices has approached constitutional precedents and justified its reversal and quantifies which Courts have reversed the most constitutional precedents and why. Constitutional Precedent in US Supreme Court Reasoning is essential reading for law professors and students interested in precedent and its role in legal reasoning. Law libraries which will find this book of importance to their collections on legal reasoning and analysis.
Author | : Michael A. Bailey |
Publisher | : Princeton University Press |
Total Pages | : 233 |
Release | : 2011-09-11 |
Genre | : Law |
ISBN | : 0691151059 |
Download The Constrained Court Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle
How do Supreme Court justices decide their cases? Do they follow their policy preferences? Or are they constrained by the law and by other political actors? The Constrained Court combines new theoretical insights and extensive data analysis to show that law and politics together shape the behavior of justices on the Supreme Court. Michael Bailey and Forrest Maltzman show how two types of constraints have influenced the decision making of the modern Court. First, Bailey and Maltzman document that important legal doctrines, such as respect for precedents, have influenced every justice since 1950. The authors find considerable variation in how these doctrines affect each justice, variation due in part to the differing experiences justices have brought to the bench. Second, Bailey and Maltzman show that justices are constrained by political factors. Justices are not isolated from what happens in the legislative and executive branches, and instead respond in predictable ways to changes in the preferences of Congress and the president. The Constrained Court shatters the myth that justices are unconstrained actors who pursue their personal policy preferences at all costs. By showing how law and politics interact in the construction of American law, this book sheds new light on the unique role that the Supreme Court plays in the constitutional order.
Author | : Saul Brenner |
Publisher | : Cambridge University Press |
Total Pages | : 182 |
Release | : 1995-04-28 |
Genre | : Law |
ISBN | : 9780521451888 |
Download Stare Indecisis Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle
This book presents a full-length empirical study of why US Supreme Court justices have chosen to alter precedent.