The Nations Report Card Reading 2011 Trial Urban District Snapshot Report Los Angeles Unified School District Grade 8 Public Schools PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download The Nations Report Card Reading 2011 Trial Urban District Snapshot Report Los Angeles Unified School District Grade 8 Public Schools PDF full book. Access full book title The Nations Report Card Reading 2011 Trial Urban District Snapshot Report Los Angeles Unified School District Grade 8 Public Schools.
Author | : National Center for Education Statistics (ED) |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 1 |
Release | : 2011 |
Genre | : |
ISBN | : |
Download The Nation's Report Card Reading 2011 Trial Urban District Snapshot Report. Los Angeles Unified School District. Grade 8, Public Schools Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle
This one-page report presents overall results, achievement level percentages and average score results, scores at selected percentiles, average scores for district and large cities, results for student groups (school race, gender, and eligibility for National School Lunch Program) in 2011, and score gaps for student groups. In 2011, the average score of eighth-grade students in Los Angeles was 246. This was lower than the average score of 255 for public school students in large cities. The average score for students in Los Angeles in 2011 (246) was not significantly different from their average score in 2009 (244) and was higher than their average score in 2002 (237). In 2011, the score gap between students in Los Angeles at the 75th percentile and students at the 25th percentile was 48 points. This performance gap was not significantly different from that of 2002 (48 points). The percentage of students in Los Angeles who performed at or above the NAEP (National Assessment of Educational Progress) "Proficient" level was 16 percent in 2011. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2009 (15 percent) and was greater than that in 2002 (10 percent). The percentage of students in Los Angeles who performed at or above the NAEP "Basic" level was 56 percent in 2011. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2009 (54 percent) and was greater than that in 2002 (44 percent). [For the main report, "The Nation's Report Card: Reading 2011. Trial Urban District Assessment Results at Grades 4 and 8. NCES 2012-455," see ED527171.].
Author | : National Center for Education Statistics (ED) |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 1 |
Release | : 2011 |
Genre | : |
ISBN | : |
Download The Nation's Report Card Reading 2011 Trial Urban District Snapshot Report. Los Angeles Unified School District. Grade 4, Public Schools Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle
This one-page report presents overall results, achievement level percentages and average score results, scores at selected percentiles, average scores for district and large cities, results for student groups (school race, gender, and eligibility for National School Lunch Program) in 2011, and score gaps for student groups. In 2011, the average score of fourth-grade students in Los Angeles was 201. This was lower than the average score of 211 for public school students in large cities. The average score for students in Los Angeles in 2011 (201) was not significantly different from their average score in 2009 (197) and was higher than their average score in 2002 (191). In 2011, the score gap between students in Los Angeles at the 75th percentile and students at the 25th percentile was 48 points. This performance gap was not significantly different from that of 2002 (52 points). The percentage of students in Los Angeles who performed at or above the NAEP (National Assessment of Educational Progress) "Proficient" level was 15 percent in 2011. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2009 (13 percent) and was greater than that in 2002 (11 percent). The percentage of students in Los Angeles who performed at or above the NAEP "Basic" level was 45 percent in 2011. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2009 (40 percent) and was greater than that in 2002 (33 percent). [For the main report, "The Nation's Report Card: Reading 2011. Trial Urban District Assessment Results at Grades 4 and 8. NCES 2012-455," see ED527171.].
Author | : National Center for Education Statistics (ED) |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 1 |
Release | : 2013 |
Genre | : |
ISBN | : |
Download The Nation's Report Card Reading 2013 Trial Urban District Snapshot Report. Los Angeles Unified School District. Grade 8, Public Schools Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle
The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), in partnership with the National Assessment Governing Board and the Council of the Great City Schools (CGCS), created the Trial Urban District Assessment (TUDA) in 2002 to support the improvement of student achievement in the nation's large urban districts. NAEP TUDA results in mathematics and reading are based on representative samples of 1,100 to 2,300 public school students at grade 4 and 900 to 2,100 public school students at grade 8 in each participating urban district in 2013. Twenty-one urban districts participated in the 2013 assessments. This one-page report presents overall results, achievement-level percentages and average score results, scores at selected percentiles, average scores for district and large cities, results for student groups in 2013, and score gaps for student groups. In 2013, the average score of eighth-grade students in Los Angeles was 250. This was lower than the average score of 258 for public school students in large cities. The average score for students in Los Angeles in 2013 (250) was higher than their average score in 2011 (246) and in 2002 (237). The score gap between higher performing students in Los Angeles (those at the 75th percentile) and lower performing students (those at the 25th percentile) was 47 points in 2013. This performance gap was not significantly different from that in 2002 (48 points). The percentage of students in Los Angeles who performed at or above the NAEP "Proficient" level was 19 percent in 2013. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2011 (16 percent) and was greater than that in 2002 (10 percent). The percentage of students in Los Angeles who performed at or above the NAEP "Basic" level was 60 percent in 2013. This percentage was greater than that in 2011 (56 percent) and in 2002 (44 percent). [For "The Nation's Report Card: A First Look--2013 Mathematics and Reading Trial Urban District Assessment. NCES 2014-466," see ED544551.].
Author | : National Center for Education Statistics (ED) |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 1 |
Release | : 2013 |
Genre | : |
ISBN | : |
Download The Nation's Report Card Reading 2013 Trial Urban District Snapshot Report. Los Angeles Unified School District. Grade 4, Public Schools Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle
The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), in partnership with the National Assessment Governing Board and the Council of the Great City Schools (CGCS), created the Trial Urban District Assessment (TUDA) in 2002 to support the improvement of student achievement in the nation's large urban districts. NAEP TUDA results in mathematics and reading are based on representative samples of 1,100 to 2,300 public school students at grade 4 and 900 to 2,100 public school students at grade 8 in each participating urban district in 2013. Twenty-one urban districts participated in the 2013 assessments. This one-page report presents overall results, achievement-level percentages and average score results, scores at selected percentiles, average scores for district and large cities, results for student groups in 2013, and score gaps for student groups. In 2013, the average score of fourth-grade students in Los Angeles was 205. This was lower than the average score of 212 for public school students in large cities. The average score for students in Los Angeles in 2013 (205) was higher than their average score in 2011 (201) and in 2002 (191). The score gap between higher performing students in Los Angeles (those at the 75th percentile) and lower performing students (those at the 25th percentile) was 50 points in 2013. This performance gap was not significantly different from that in 2002 (52 points). The percentage of students in Los Angeles who performed at or above the NAEP "Proficient" level was 19 percent in 2013. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2011 (15 percent) and was greater than that in 2002 (11 percent). The percentage of students in Los Angeles who performed at or above the NAEP "Basic" level was 50 percent in 2013. This percentage was greater than that in 2011 (45 percent) and in 2002 (33 percent). [For "The Nation's Report Card: A First Look--2013 Mathematics and Reading Trial Urban District Assessment. NCES 2014-466," see ED544551.].
Author | : Benjamin P. Bowser |
Publisher | : SUNY Press |
Total Pages | : 454 |
Release | : 2019-09-01 |
Genre | : Social Science |
ISBN | : 1438475993 |
Download Racial Inequality in New York City since 1965 Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle
A comprehensive exploration of racial inequality in New York City since 1965. In the past, the study of racial inequality in New York City has usually had a narrow focus, examining particular social problems affecting ethnic-racial groups. In contrast, this book provides a comprehensive overview of racial inequality in the city’s economy, housing, and education sectors over the last half-century. A collection of original essays by some of New York’s most well-known and emerging urban experts, Racial Inequality in New York City since 1965 explores what city government has done and failed to do to address racial inequality. It examines the changes in circumstances of Asian, Latino, West Indian, and African American New Yorkers, outlining how theirs have either improved or deteriorated relative to their white counterparts. The contributors also analyze how practices and policies in policing, public housing, public health, and community services have maintained racial inequality and discuss how political participation can increase social capital among city residents in order to reduce racial inequality. The book concludes by offering a compendium of practical recommendations and actions that can be implemented to address racial inequality in the city. “This book provides a broad and up-to-date survey of social and demographic trends in New York City. Unlike many other works, it crosses policy arenas and is not shy in advocating community action.” — J. Phillip Thompson, New York City Deputy Mayor for Strategic Policy Initiatives
Author | : National Center for Education Statistics (ED) |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 1 |
Release | : 2013 |
Genre | : |
ISBN | : |
Download The Nation's Report Card Mathematics 2013 Trial Urban District Snapshot Report. Los Angeles Unified School District. Grade 8, Public Schools Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle
The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), in partnership with the National Assessment Governing Board and the Council of the Great City Schools (CGCS), created the Trial Urban District Assessment (TUDA) in 2002 to support the improvement of student achievement in the nation's large urban districts. NAEP TUDA results in mathematics and reading are based on representative samples of 1,100 to 2,300 public school students at grade 4 and 900 to 2,100 public school students at grade 8 in each participating urban district in 2013. Twenty-one urban districts participated in the 2013 assessments. This one-page report presents overall results, achievement-level percentages and average score results, scores at selected percentiles, average scores for district and large cities, results for student groups in 2013, and score gaps for student groups. In 2013, the average score of eighth-grade students in Los Angeles was 264. This was lower than the average score of 276 for public school students in large cities. The average score for students in Los Angeles in 2013 (264) was not significantly different from their average score in 2011 (261) and was higher than their average score in 2003 (245). The score gap between higher performing students in Los Angeles (those at the 75th percentile) and lower performing students (those at the 25th percentile) was 51 points in 2013. This performance gap was not significantly different from that in 2003 (50 points). The percentage of students in Los Angeles who performed at or above the NAEP Proficient level was 18 percent in 2013. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2011 (16 percent) and was greater than that in 2003 (7 percent). The percentage of students in Los Angeles who performed at or above the NAEP Basic level was 54 percent in 2013. This percentage was greater than that in 2011 (49 percent) and in 2003 (32 percent). [For "The Nation's Report Card: A First Look--2013 Mathematics and Reading Trial Urban District Assessment. NCES 2014-466," see ED544551.].
Author | : National Center for Education Statistics (ED) |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 1 |
Release | : 2013 |
Genre | : |
ISBN | : |
Download The Nation's Report Card Mathematics 2013 Trial Urban District Snapshot Report. Los Angeles Unified School District. Grade 4, Public Schools Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle
The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), in partnership with the National Assessment Governing Board and the Council of the Great City Schools (CGCS), created the Trial Urban District Assessment (TUDA) in 2002 to support the improvement of student achievement in the nation's large urban districts. NAEP TUDA results in mathematics and reading are based on representative samples of 1,100 to 2,300 public school students at grade 4 and 900 to 2,100 public school students at grade 8 in each participating urban district in 2013. Twenty-one urban districts participated in the 2013 assessments. This one-page report presents overall results, achievement-level percentages and average score results, scores at selected percentiles, average scores for district and large cities, results for student groups in 2013, and score gaps for student groups. In 2013, the average score of fourth-grade students in Los Angeles was 228. This was lower than the average score of 235 for public school students in large cities. The average score for students in Los Angeles in 2013 (228) was higher than their average score in 2011 (223) and in 2003 (216). The score gap between higher performing students in Los Angeles (those at the 75th percentile) and lower performing students (those at the 25th percentile) was 41 points in 2013. This performance gap was not significantly different from that in 2003 (39 points). The percentage of students in Los Angeles who performed at or above the NAEP "Proficient" level was 25 percent in 2013. This percentage was greater than that in 2011 (20 percent) and in 2003 (13 percent). The percentage of students in Los Angeles who performed at or above the NAEP "Basic" level was 69 percent in 2013. This percentage was greater than that in 2011 (63 percent) and in 2003 (52 percent). [For "The Nation's Report Card: A First Look--2013 Mathematics and Reading Trial Urban District Assessment. NCES 2014-466," see ED544551.].
Author | : |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 380 |
Release | : 2001 |
Genre | : Academic achievement |
ISBN | : |
Download The Nation's Report Card Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle
Author | : Gene Bottoms |
Publisher | : ASCD |
Total Pages | : 233 |
Release | : 2022-04-11 |
Genre | : Education |
ISBN | : 1416630880 |
Download Tomorrow’s High School Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle
How do some high schools produce graduates that consistently achieve at high levels? Would you believe there's a set of proven strategies that could help you deliver similar impressive results and better prepare students for the world after high school? High schools in the United States face a startling reality: many graduates are unprepared for success in postsecondary studies or for high-demand, well-paying jobs in a rapidly changing economy. Although this situation is alarming, the high schools that have embraced new ways of learning show us what is possible. Drawing from his experience with the High Schools That Work initiative, Gene Bottoms offers educators a path forward by urging them to pursue bold goals and outlining bold actions for achieving those goals. His vision is clear: replace the traditional model of secondary education with one that engages students in a rigorous curriculum that combines a solid academic core with intellectually demanding career pathway courses. The notion that nearly all students can achieve at high levels is borne out by numerous examples of high schools—including those with traditionally underperforming student populations—that have used key strategies to help all students realize their potential. Bottoms explains the root causes of the current shortcomings in high school education and then specifies critical components of successful transformation: * Shared leadership; * Powerful assignments—especially in math, literacy, and career/technical education—planned and executed by academic and career pathway teachers working together; * Strengthened connections between middle school and high school; * A redesigned senior year; and * Comprehensive counseling and advisory programs. Provocative and persuasive in its sense of urgency, Tomorrow's High School offers proven and practical solutions to finally make high schools a rich and rewarding experience for all students, whatever their future college and career goals may be. This book is a copublication of ASCD and SREB. It includes access to nine downloadable appendixes.
Author | : David Whitman |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 390 |
Release | : 2008 |
Genre | : Academic achievement |
ISBN | : |
Download Sweating the Small Stuff Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle
This book tells the story of six secondary schools that have succeeded in eliminating or dramatically shrinking the achievement gap between whites and disadvantaged black and Hispanic students. It recounts the stories of the University Park Campus School (UPCS) in Worcester, the American Indian Public Charter School in Oakland, Amistad Academy in New Haven, the Cristo Rey Jesuit High School in Chicago, the KIPP Academy in the Bronx, and the SEED school in Washington, D.C.