Student Equity In Australian Higher Education PDF Download

Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Student Equity In Australian Higher Education PDF full book. Access full book title Student Equity In Australian Higher Education.

Student Equity in Australian Higher Education

Student Equity in Australian Higher Education
Author: Andrew Harvey
Publisher: Springer
Total Pages: 301
Release: 2016-03-29
Genre: Education
ISBN: 9811003157

Download Student Equity in Australian Higher Education Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

This book examines twenty-five years of the Australian framework for student equity in higher education, A Fair Chance for All. Divided into two sections, the book reflects on the legacy of equity policy in higher education, the effectiveness of current approaches, and the likely challenges facing future policymakers. The first section explores the creation of the framework, including the major elements of the policy, the political context of its development, and how it compares with international models developed during the same period. The performance of the six student equity groups identified within the framework is also examined. The second section of the book considers future trends and challenges. The Australian university sector has undergone seismic change in the past twenty-five years and faces further changes of equal magnitude. The twenty-fifth anniversary of A Fair Chance for All comes as Australian higher education is poised for another wave of transformation, with rising expansion, competition, and stratification. While the emerging landscape is new, the questions have changed little since A Fair Chance for All was first conceived: How should we define student equity, and what policies are likely to promote it?


Student Equity in Higher Education

Student Equity in Higher Education
Author: National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education (Australia). Forum
Publisher:
Total Pages: 119
Release: 2009
Genre: College students
ISBN:

Download Student Equity in Higher Education Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle


The Best Chance for All

The Best Chance for All
Author:
Publisher:
Total Pages: 20
Release: 2019
Genre:
ISBN:

Download The Best Chance for All Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

In June 2018, the National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education (NCSEHE) set out to develop a long-term strategic vision for student equity in Australian higher education through a national collaborative process under the banner of Student Equity 2030 . The core outcome of this process is The Best Chance for All , a proposed national policy statement for student equity in Australian tertiary education. The Best Chance for All is an outcome of the NCSEHEâs comprehensive program, informing research, policy and practice to build a more equitable higher education system. This includes internal, collaborative and commissioned research; an Equity Fellows Program; the engagement of stakeholders in forums and workshops; and the production and dissemination of publications. All of these activities aim to facilitate greater success in access, retention and outcomes for students from disadvantaged backgrounds. The Student Equity 2030 process engaged close to 200 stakeholders and experts who shared their insights to address some of the most vexed issues confronting Australiaâs education system in the 21st century. This report charts the process undertaken to arrive at The Best Chance for All as a policy statement to guide future developments in Australian tertiary education. It briefly describes the key issues confronted during consultations with a wide variety of stakeholders in student equity research, policy and practice and how they were addressed in the context of the proposed policy statement. This is not an exhaustive report that lists the myriad of challenges and possible solutions. Instead, it focuses on a proposed policy statement, The Best Chance for All , its genesis, and its potential for informing future policy reforms, practice and research. [Setting the scene, ed]


Capability, Belonging and Equity in Higher Education

Capability, Belonging and Equity in Higher Education
Author: Professor Penny Jane Burke
Publisher:
Total Pages:
Release: 2016-02-25
Genre:
ISBN: 9780994538109

Download Capability, Belonging and Equity in Higher Education Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

Student equity in higher education is often framed by constructions of capability that imply that intelligence, potential and ability is innate. The assumption that underpins many national widening participation agendas, namely that all students with the potential to benefit from higher education should have fair access to higher education regardless of social background, is problematic (Archer & Leathwood 2003). The problem rests in the suggestion that 'potential' to benefit from higher education is an attribute that can be straightforwardly identified in order to ensure fair access. It also implies that potential to benefit from higher education is about natural talent, ability and/or intelligence and is detached from social, cultural and educational dis/advantage and inequalities (Morley & Lugg 2009, p. 41).This mixed methods project draws on extant data from a 2014 pilot study examining students' beliefs about ability, intelligence and how this is related to levels of confidence. The extant data was generated through a survey instrument drawing on the work of Carol Dweck (2000; 2013). As part of the National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education (NCSEHE) funded study, further qualitative data were generated. In total, 772 students were surveyed, 41 students took part in either focus groups or in-depth interviews and 19 university lecturers participated in focus groups or were individually interviewed.The aim of the project was to: * explore and identify the different meanings attached to 'capability' in particular contexts (such as subject or course); * consider the ways these meanings shape the experiences, practices and sense of belonging of students from non-traditional backgrounds; and* help improve the educational opportunities and completion rates for university students from non-traditional (non-ATAR) and other educationally disadvantaged backgrounds through contributing a more nuanced understanding of capability.


Principles for Equity in Higher Education Performance Funding

Principles for Equity in Higher Education Performance Funding
Author:
Publisher:
Total Pages: 59
Release: 2018
Genre:
ISBN:

Download Principles for Equity in Higher Education Performance Funding Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

Governments have long sought to assess and reward higher education institutions for their performance. Understanding the relative performance of institutions in teaching, retaining and graduating students would provide accountability for growing public funding, and would also be extremely helpful for prospective students. What constitutes performanc e though, and how should it be measured? To answer these questions, it is helpful to refer to the national objectives of higher education. Enshrined in legislation, the goals of Australian higher education include quality, diversity, and the promotion of student equity. âPerformanceâ would ideally be defined by institutional success against these inter-related objectives, whether assessing teaching quality or the ability to develop thoughtful, productive and employable graduates. The following report does not attempt to provide a prescriptive definition of performance nor of potential metrics. We do not advocate the introduction or otherwise of a broad performance funding model, and we do not outline any specific, preferred version of a model that might be introduced. Instead, we focus on why, and how, any effective performance model would incorporate principles of student equity. Drawing on Australian higher education history, evidence from the United States (US) and the United Kingdom (UK), and an analysi s of contemporary Australian data, we argue that there are three fundamental principles required to ensure an effective and equitable performance funding model. The first principle is to integrate student equity as an explicit objective of the model. Performance funding objectives need to align with broader national objectives of higher education, including the policy and legislative commitment to student equity. Analysis of Australian data reveals variable institutional commitment to the goal of widening participation, highlighting the potential value of including equity of access as a performance objective in its own right. The need to integrate student equity would also be inherent in the design of metrics for student success, retention, completion, satisfaction, and outcomes. Secondly, embedding equity principles in performance funding requires the rewarding of genuine performance rather than simply outcomes. Control ling for student equity and/or correlated factors is critical to isolate performance and determine the value added by each institution. Relatedly, there is a need to develop measures of âlearning gainâ and better understanding of the institutional contribution to graduate outcomes. Such work has the potential to disrupt existing research-based rankings and to identify institutions that are high performing in teaching and supporting students, including those from equity groups. Our analysis of current Australian data, however, suggests that many existing potential metrics are either negatively o r not correlated with each other. In addition, the public universities report relatively homogeneous student outcomes on most measures. Significant further work is required to distinguish institutional performance in areas of teaching, success, student sat isfaction, and graduate outcomes. Finally, equitable performance funding models would be student-centred. This approach would involve including students in the design and assessment of any proposed model, and ensuring inclusion of the student voice withi n the performance metrics themselves. Further, models would provide clear and transparent information that students could easily access and understand, including for non-university higher education institutions. Indeed, our analysis suggests that non - unive rsities include both the highest and lowest performers on many potential measures, but prospective students currently lack much of this information. Unless models are explicitly student-centred, performance funding could exacerbate inequity, partly by providing information that is accessible only to the most privileged students. [Executive summary, ed]


Australian Higher Education Equity Ranking Project

Australian Higher Education Equity Ranking Project
Author:
Publisher:
Total Pages: 91
Release: 2019
Genre:
ISBN:

Download Australian Higher Education Equity Ranking Project Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

This report details the findings of a feasibility study for the Department of Education and Training (DET) into the development of a higher education student equity ranking index. The purpose of study was to determine whether it was possible to measure higher education equity performance at the institutional level and convey each institution's relative performance through an 'equity rank'. The ranking was to be based on institutional performance in regard to equity-group students, including students from low socio-economic backgrounds; students from regional/remote areas of Australia; Indigenous students; students with disability; and students from non-English speaking backgrounds. [Abstract]


Equity Groups and Predictors of Academic Success in Higher Education

Equity Groups and Predictors of Academic Success in Higher Education
Author:
Publisher:
Total Pages: 19
Release: 2015
Genre:
ISBN:

Download Equity Groups and Predictors of Academic Success in Higher Education Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

Research studies in the United States of America identified differences between First in Family (FiF) and non-FiF students. There is contradictory evidence regarding differences in college achievement between FiF and non-FiF students in the USA. Some studies found no differences (Inman and Mayes, 1999; Strage, 1999) and other studies indicated lower GPAs for first-generation students (Martinez, Sher, Krull and Wood, 2009; Pascarella et al., 2004). Australian research on FiF university students is limited in number and in the scope of variables that may impact on achievement and university experience. The limited research on FIF students in the Australian context has covered aspects related to decision-making and enrolment patterns as well as attributions and indicators of success (Luzeckyj et al., 2011). These students were more likely to be enrolled in certain degrees (Education, Economics and Science as opposed to Law, Medicine and Engineering), be older, and come from a rural background. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of FiF status, socio-economic and demographic contributors to the academic outcomes of students enrolled in a large regional Australian university. [Executive summary].


Student Equity Performance in Australian Higher Education

Student Equity Performance in Australian Higher Education
Author:
Publisher:
Total Pages: 15
Release: 2014
Genre:
ISBN: 9780992356026

Download Student Equity Performance in Australian Higher Education Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

This NCSEHE Briefing Note provides an update on domestic undergraduate student enrolment and equity outcomes from 2007 to 2014, following Koshy and Seymour (2014). It focuses on undergraduate outcomes for Table A providers, given policy changes in recent years to Australian undergraduate education that affect them, including the full deregulation of undergraduate places in 2012 under the Demand Driven System (DDS). It reports on the number of domestic undergraduates between 2007 and 2014 in the 38 âTable A providersâ in Australian higher education and enrolments in seven equity groups. [Introduction, ed].