Safety Evaluation Of Signalized Restricted Crossing U Turn Intersections PDF Download

The use of alternative intersection designs can provide both safety and operational benefits for road users at potentially lower costs when implemented in the appropriate setting. The Federal Highway Administration has previously recognized a subset of alternative intersections designs broadly referred to as "reduced left-turn conflict intersections" as a proven safety countermeasure that have been shown to decrease the risk of potentially severe crash types by reducing conflict points through the use of indirect left-turn movements. Median U-turn intersections (also referred to as "Michigan lefts" or "boulevard turnarounds") are one such alterative design that accommodates indirect left-turn movements via directional U-turn crossovers located within the median along one or both of the intersecting roadways. Michigan has long been a pioneer in the implementation of median U-turns along urban and suburban divided boulevards, with initial installations dating back several decades. Additionally, various indirect left-turn configurations have been implemented along rural highways and frontage roads for urban freeways.While prior work has consistently demonstrated that median U-turn intersection designs represent an effective countermeasure that can improve operational performance and reduce the frequency of severe crash types when implemented in the appropriate context, much of the extant research is outdated and several important areas of investigation remain unexplored. This includes defining the appropriate crash influence area, the impacts of pre-conversion characteristics, impacts to pedestrian and bicycle collisions, and evaluating crashes pre/post conversion (e.g., longitudinal panel data) compared to a purely cross-sectional evaluation. To address these and other knowledge gaps, research was performed to quantify the safety performance characteristics and develop analytical tools related to the utilization of median U-turn intersections. Historical traffic crash data were collected for signalized and unsignalized intersections in Michigan where left-turns are accommodated by a median U-turn design. To allow for comparison of the performance between the median U-turn and traditional designs, data were also collected for a sample of reference intersections (divided and undivided) where conventional direct left-turn movements were maintained. A novel approach was developed to define the safety performance influence area of a median U-turn intersection, which subsequently improved the method of identifying and collecting target crash data. Utilizing the traffic crash data, a series of analyses were performed to identify the differences between conventional and median U-turn intersections, and to also identify the differences in safety performance between various median U-turn design characteristics. The analyses compared crash rates, types, severity distributions, and severe injury collision patterns, and included development of series of safety performance functions and crash modification factors. The results were then generalized into a series of recommendations for roadway agencies considering future implementation of median U-turn intersections, including specific design recommendations intended to improve safety performance for all road users.Ultimately, it was concluded that median U-turn designs represent an effective safety countermeasure to target the reduction of severe crash types for both unsignalized and signalized intersections. While there are some potential tradeoffs with respect to non-injury crash frequencies for specific pre-conversion configurations, the use of these indirect left-turn intersection designs is consistent with the Safe System approach adopted by the United States Department of Transportation within the National Roadway Safety Strategy. Unsignalized median U-turn intersections offer superior fatal and injury crash performance compared to conventional unsignalized intersections. The removal of the crossing conflict points at unsignalized median U-turn designs (which include a closed median at the intersection) essentially eliminates the pattern of severe head on left-turn and angle collisions occurring within conventional intersections. However, it is important to recognize that non-injury crashes were shown to increase when converting a conventional unsignalized intersection to a median U-turn at locations with an existing median on the major roadway.Signalized median U-turn intersections offer superior safety performance for both injury and non-injury crashes compared to conventional signalized intersections along undivided roadways. However, the comparison of median U-turns locations to conventional divided signalized intersections was limited by a lack of reference sites with comparable traffic volumes. Annual average frequencies of severe pedestrian and bicycle crashes were similar between the signalized median U-turn and conventional undivided sites. Finally, several design features of signalized median U-turn intersections were identified as having a significant impact on safety performance, including the distance to crossovers from the main intersection, the length of weaving areas, the number of signalized crossovers, and the number of storage lanes.