Review And Analysis Of Oil Shale Technologies Volume Iv Aboveground Or Surface Technology PDF Download

A technical description and evaluation of retorting methods and scale-up scenarios of four representative methods are presented. The methods described and evaluated include the processes developed by the Bureau of Mines (BOM), the Union Oil Company ''B, '' Petrosix, Paraho, TOSCO II, and the Superior Oil Company. For a future economic analysis, scale-up (ranging from 55,000- to 58,000-bbl/day production rate) scenarios are presented for BOM's Gas Combustion retort (GCR), Union ''B, '' Paraho, and TOSCO II retorting processes. In general, the six aboveground processes selected are in an advanced stage of development as compared with in situ processes and several of them are ready for commercial-scale demonstration. There are, however, a few areas that still need further research and development before demonstration can be undertaken. Specific areas of research cannot be defined at this time because process information needed to identify these areas is mostly proprietary. The technical evaluation reveals that the aboveground retorting processes are viable with high scale oil recovery yields. The processes, however, have been tested only at the pilot or semiworks scale and need to be demonstrated on full-scale modules. The scale-up scenarios of the representative processes reveal that the logistics of the mining-to-processing operation will be a major problem at high production rates. For example, a nominal crude shale oil production rate of about 50,000 bbl/day will require mining at a rate exceeding present large-scale mining rates. The TOSCO II retorting process is the most energy intensive among Paraho, Union ''B, '' and BOM's GCR because of its complexity, which annuls the benefit of less mining. The TOSCO II process, however, is still an attractive process, providing the technique is used with another technique to enhance resource utilization.