Report Of The Committee Appointed In November 1914 To Investigate The Relations Of Departmental Libraries In The University Of Chicago PDF Download

Excerpt from Report of the Committee Appointed in November, 1914: To Investigate the Relations of Departmental Libraries in the University of Chicago The co-ordination of Departmental Libraries with one another and with the General Library is a question more acute, perhaps, at the University of Chicago than elsewhere. Nevertheless the problems involved should be of interest to all large university libraries. Following the example of a similar committee of the University of Glasgow, the University of Chicago Committee has therefore decided to make the report of its investigations available in printed form. It is thought that not only members of the Faculty and administrative officers of the University of Chicago, but also officers of other universities and libraries confronted by similar conditions, may find the report of assistance. Particularly should the answers from the large university libraries to the list of questions sent out by the Committee prove of value for comparison and reference. Report of Committee on Department Libraries The establishment in 1892 of a considerable number of Departmental Libraries and their subsequent development without adequate co-ordination or central control of purchases, catalogues, classification systems, and rules had by 1914 led to a condition which clearly demanded the attention of the Board of Libraries. After some discussion of the difficulties and problems involved, a Committee was appointed, consisting of the following: E. D. Burton, R. R. Bcnsley, H. G. Gale, C. H. Judd, J. M. Manly, E. T. Merrill, R. D. Salisbury. W. I. Thomas, and J. C. M. Hanson. Certain suggestions were drawn up and submitted to the Committee, as follows: 1. Study the reports on Departmental Libraries, other data, and exhibits illustrating present conditions and tendencies, to be submitted by the Director and Associate Director of the Libraries. 2. Decide on principles to be followed in location - a) Of books on subjects of interest to several departments. b) Of books on a special subject of interest mainly to one department. 3. Consider whether it may not be advisable to adopt the principle followed in the great majority of other university libraries, viz., that books purchased on the appropriation or on the recommendation of a given department are not necessarily to be classified or shelved in the library of that department, but rather in the department with whose collections the work belongs according to its subject-matter. If this principle is not to be generally applied, shall it be adopted for departments housed in the Harper Group? 4. Decide where certain important classes or subclasses of interest to more than one department are to be located, e.g., Classical History and Topography, in Classics Library or History; History and Topography of Romance, and Germanic countries, in History, Modern Languages, or Geography; Educational Psychology, Moral and Religious Education, in Harper or in Haskell; books on playgrounds and games, in Harper or in Haskell; Jewish History and Topography, in Harper or in Haskell; etc. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.