Perception As A Capacity For Knowledge PDF Download

The idea of reparation OCo of amends owed for wrongs and wrongful harms OCo is ancient, universal, and a basic intuition of justice. Yet despite its ancient and distinguished lineage in Western philosophy, its familiar role in legal remedies for unjust losses and takings, and its increasing application to victims of political violence and repression, reparative justice has not received the wide consideration and sustained debate in contemporary thought that distributive and retributive justice have enjoyed.A fully developed conception of reparative justice would answer at least the following questions. Which injuries or harms trigger obligations of reparation? What kind of responsibility or relation to wrongs and harms entail obligations to make reparations? Who in relation to a wrong or harm has the standing to receive reparations? What vehicles (acts and goods offered) are capable of conveying appropriate and effective reparations? What is the measure of just reparations? What aim or end is sought, and what value or concern is at stake, in doing reparative justice?In this book, I make a start on the last three questions concerning the means, the ends, and the measure of reparative justice. I defend two fundamental and somewhat revisionary ideas about the nature of reparations and so about the kind of justice they represent. The first is that, despite its strong association with material restitution or money payments, reparations are inherently a communicative transaction. Reparative gestures and offers must bear a certain set of meanings that are communicated between those who make amends and those who receive them. The second idea explains the first: despite the association of reparative justice with wrongful loss and a remedy for it, and hence with restitution or compensation, the more fundamental issue in reparations, I argue, is the moral vulnerability of victims of serious wrongs. Specifically, it is vulnerability to being ignored, erased, or held in contempt when one lacks the standing to call others to an accounting of their responsibilities where one is unjustly treated. Reparative justice requires that moral vulnerability be confronted and that the standing of injured parties to call others to responsibility be affirmed. Moral vulnerability explains why material tenders or transfers are often but not always necessary, and why they do not alone suffice for reparations.CULLED FROM THE AUTHORS INTRODUCTION"