New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Judicial Department PDF Download

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1900 edition. Excerpt: ...to the question as is immaterial and irrelevant, the objection is overruled, and defendant excepts. A. No, sir. I went to Slaterville Springs for the same reason that I quit the Mutual Reserve four years ago, was threatened with diabetes, had sugar in my urine, and the doctor ordered me to drink the waters. I was there the year before. 3381 Q. Did you have any more symptoms of nervous prostration? A. No, sir; nothing of the kind. Re-direct Examination By Mb. Milliken: Referring to my testimony on cross-examination, I desire to insert the words " Saturday the 11th instant" to my answer to the question "When after December 8th, 1897, did you again call there?" so that my an 3382 swer will read " Saturday the 11th instant and the next Monday ." On cross-examination I was asked " When did N. W. Bloss cease his connection with the defendant?" The stenographer records my answer in December 1889. My recollection is some time in December 1890 or the latter part of November or the first of December, 1889. I desire to change "1889" to "1890 ." Q. Do you recall in your cross-examination you were asked this question: "Will you tell me any person 3383 that jon ever heard speak ill of N. W. Bloss? "and j'our answer is: "Yes, I heard Dr. J. W. Bowden; I heard Mr. O. D. Baldwin; I heard Mr. Hayward, of Loudon; I heard Mr. Carter, the book-keeper of the London office; I heard Dr. Stephen H. Tyng, of Paris, and I have heard others whose names I do not now just recall; T heard about everybody that was ever connected with Mr. Bloss that I knew." Now, do you recall any others that you have heard speak ill of Mr. Bloss V Counsel for Plaintiff objects to the question as being...