Main Justice PDF Download

Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Main Justice PDF full book. Access full book title Main Justice.

Main Justice

Main Justice
Author: Jim McGee
Publisher: Simon and Schuster
Total Pages: 404
Release: 1997-07-08
Genre: Law
ISBN: 0684832712

Download Main Justice Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

Award-winning investigative reporters journey inside the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice to see how the powerful law enforcement agency fights America's war on crime. This perceptive examination reveals how the Justice Department operates--from its role in history to critical evaluations of its wars against the Cali cocaine cartel, violent gangs in Shreveport and Chicago, high-level government espionage, and international terrorism.


Main Justice

Main Justice
Author: Jim McGee
Publisher:
Total Pages: 408
Release: 1996
Genre: Law
ISBN:

Download Main Justice Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

An inside examination of the U.S. Department of Justice and how its awesome powers to investigate and punish wrongdoing are use--and sometimes abused--in the war on crime.


United States Attorneys' Manual

United States Attorneys' Manual
Author: United States. Department of Justice
Publisher:
Total Pages:
Release: 1988
Genre: Justice, Administration of
ISBN:

Download United States Attorneys' Manual Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle


The Great Chief Justice

The Great Chief Justice
Author: Charles F. Hobson
Publisher:
Total Pages: 278
Release: 1996
Genre: Biography & Autobiography
ISBN:

Download The Great Chief Justice Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

"John Marshall remains one of the towering figures in the landscape of American law. From the Revolution to the age of Jackson, he played a critical role in defining the "province of the judiciary" and the constitutional limits of legislative action. In this masterly study, Charles Hobson clarifies the coherence and thrust of Marshall's jurisprudence while keeping in sight the man as well as the jurist." "Hobson argues that contrary to his critics, Marshall was no ideologue intent upon appropriating the lawmaking powers of Congress. Rather, he was deeply committed to a principled jurisprudence that was based on a steadfast devotion to a "science of law" richly steeped in the common law tradition. As Hobson shows, such jurisprudence governed every aspect of Marshall's legal philosophy and court opinions, including his understanding of judicial review." "The chief justice, Hobson contends, did not invent judicial review (as many have claimed) but consolidated its practice by adapting common law methods to the needs of a new nation. In practice, his use of judicial review was restrained, employed almost exclusively against acts of the state legislatures. Ultimately, he wielded judicial review to prevent the states from undermining the power of a national government still struggling to establish sovereignty at home and respect abroad."--BOOK JACKET.Title Summary field provided by Blackwell North America, Inc. All Rights Reserved


FDR and Chief Justice Hughes

FDR and Chief Justice Hughes
Author: James F. Simon
Publisher: Simon and Schuster
Total Pages: 482
Release: 2012-02-07
Genre: History
ISBN: 1416578897

Download FDR and Chief Justice Hughes Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

By the author of acclaimed books on the bitter clashes between Jefferson and Chief Justice Marshall on the shaping of the nation’s constitutional future, and between Lincoln and Chief Justice Taney over slavery, secession, and the presidential war powers. Roosevelt and Chief Justice Hughes's fight over the New Deal was the most critical struggle between an American president and a chief justice in the twentieth century. The confrontation threatened the New Deal in the middle of the nation’s worst depression. The activist president bombarded the Democratic Congress with a fusillade of legislative remedies that shut down insolvent banks, regulated stocks, imposed industrial codes, rationed agricultural production, and employed a quarter million young men in the Civilian Conservation Corps. But the legislation faced constitutional challenges by a conservative bloc on the Court determined to undercut the president. Chief Justice Hughes often joined the Court’s conservatives to strike down major New Deal legislation. Frustrated, FDR proposed a Court-packing plan. His true purpose was to undermine the ability of the life-tenured Justices to thwart his popular mandate. Hughes proved more than a match for Roosevelt in the ensuing battle. In grudging admiration for Hughes, FDR said that the Chief Justice was the best politician in the country. Despite the defeat of his plan, Roosevelt never lost his confidence and, like Hughes, never ceded leadership. He outmaneuvered isolationist senators, many of whom had opposed his Court-packing plan, to expedite aid to Great Britain as the Allies hovered on the brink of defeat. He then led his country through World War II.


Model Rules of Professional Conduct

Model Rules of Professional Conduct
Author: American Bar Association. House of Delegates
Publisher: American Bar Association
Total Pages: 216
Release: 2007
Genre: Law
ISBN: 9781590318737

Download Model Rules of Professional Conduct Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

The Model Rules of Professional Conduct provides an up-to-date resource for information on legal ethics. Federal, state and local courts in all jurisdictions look to the Rules for guidance in solving lawyer malpractice cases, disciplinary actions, disqualification issues, sanctions questions and much more. In this volume, black-letter Rules of Professional Conduct are followed by numbered Comments that explain each Rule's purpose and provide suggestions for its practical application. The Rules will help you identify proper conduct in a variety of given situations, review those instances where discretionary action is possible, and define the nature of the relationship between you and your clients, colleagues and the courts.


Opinions of the Office of Legal Counsel of the United States Department of Justice

Opinions of the Office of Legal Counsel of the United States Department of Justice
Author: United States. Department of Justice. Office of Legal Counsel
Publisher:
Total Pages: 304
Release: 1996
Genre: Attorneys general's opinions
ISBN:

Download Opinions of the Office of Legal Counsel of the United States Department of Justice Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

Consisting of selected memorandum opinions advising the President of the United States, the Attorney General, and other executive officers of the Federal Government in relation to their official duties.


Whatever Happened to Justice?

Whatever Happened to Justice?
Author: Rick Maybury
Publisher:
Total Pages: 0
Release: 2004
Genre: Justice, Administration of
ISBN: 9780942617467

Download Whatever Happened to Justice? Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

"Whatever Happened to Justice?" shows what's gone wrong with America's legal system and economy and how to fix it. It also contains lots of helpful hints for improving family relationships and for making families and classrooms run more smoothly. Discusses the difference between higher law and man-made law, and the connection between rational law and economic prosperity.


Uncertain Justice

Uncertain Justice
Author: Laurence Tribe
Publisher: Macmillan
Total Pages: 416
Release: 2014-06-03
Genre: Law
ISBN: 0805099093

Download Uncertain Justice Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

An assessment of how the Supreme Court under Chief Justice John Roberts is significantly influencing the nation's laws and reinterpreting the Constitution includes in-depth analysis of recent rulings and their implications.


The Chief

The Chief
Author: Joan Biskupic
Publisher: Basic Books
Total Pages: 415
Release: 2019-03-26
Genre: Biography & Autobiography
ISBN: 0465093280

Download The Chief Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

An incisive biography of the Supreme Court's enigmatic Chief Justice, taking us inside the momentous legal decisions of his tenure so far. John Roberts was named to the Supreme Court in 2005 claiming he would act as a neutral umpire in deciding cases. His critics argue he has been anything but, pointing to his conservative victories on voting rights and campaign finance. Yet he broke from orthodoxy in his decision to preserve Obamacare. How are we to understand the motives of the most powerful judge in the land? In The Chief, award-winning journalist Joan Biskupic contends that Roberts is torn between two, often divergent, priorities: to carry out a conservative agenda, and to protect the Court's image and his place in history. Biskupic shows how Roberts's dual commitments have fostered distrust among his colleagues, with major consequences for the law. Trenchant and authoritative, The Chief reveals the making of a justice and the drama on this nation's highest court.