Judicial Review The Human Rights Act PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Judicial Review The Human Rights Act PDF full book. Access full book title Judicial Review The Human Rights Act.
| Author | : David M. Beatty |
| Publisher | : BRILL |
| Total Pages | : 374 |
| Release | : 2021-09-27 |
| Genre | : Law |
| ISBN | : 9004479406 |
Download Human Rights and Judicial Review: A Comparative Perspective Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle
Human Rights and Judicial Review: A Comparative Perspective collects, in one volume, a basic description of the most important principles and methods of analysis followed by the major Courts enforcing constitutional Bills of Rights around the world. The Courts include the Supreme Courts of Japan, India, Canada and the United States, the Constitutional Courts of Germany and Italy and the European Court of Human Rights. Each chapter is devoted to an analysis of the substantive jurisprudence developed by these Courts to determine whether a challenged law is constitutional or not, and is written by members of these Courts who have had a prior academic career. The book highlights the similarities and differences in the analytical methods used by these courts in determining whether or not someone's constitutional rights have been violated. Students and scholars of constitutional law and human rights, judges and advocates engaged in constitutional litigation will find the book a unique and valuable resource.
| Author | : Richard Gordon |
| Publisher | : Routledge |
| Total Pages | : 354 |
| Release | : 2013-05-13 |
| Genre | : Law |
| ISBN | : 113534714X |
Download Judicial Review & the Human Rights Act Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle
The Human Rights Act 1998 had a profound effect on the law of the United Kingdom,and in no area more so than judicial review. This book gives practical guidance on the interplay between the Act and domestic public law.
| Author | : Mark Tushnet |
| Publisher | : Princeton University Press |
| Total Pages | : 288 |
| Release | : 2009-07-20 |
| Genre | : Political Science |
| ISBN | : 1400828155 |
Download Weak Courts, Strong Rights Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle
Unlike many other countries, the United States has few constitutional guarantees of social welfare rights such as income, housing, or healthcare. In part this is because many Americans believe that the courts cannot possibly enforce such guarantees. However, recent innovations in constitutional design in other countries suggest that such rights can be judicially enforced--not by increasing the power of the courts but by decreasing it. In Weak Courts, Strong Rights, Mark Tushnet uses a comparative legal perspective to show how creating weaker forms of judicial review may actually allow for stronger social welfare rights under American constitutional law. Under "strong-form" judicial review, as in the United States, judicial interpretations of the constitution are binding on other branches of government. In contrast, "weak-form" review allows the legislature and executive to reject constitutional rulings by the judiciary--as long as they do so publicly. Tushnet describes how weak-form review works in Great Britain and Canada and discusses the extent to which legislatures can be expected to enforce constitutional norms on their own. With that background, he turns to social welfare rights, explaining the connection between the "state action" or "horizontal effect" doctrine and the enforcement of social welfare rights. Tushnet then draws together the analysis of weak-form review and that of social welfare rights, explaining how weak-form review could be used to enforce those rights. He demonstrates that there is a clear judicial path--not an insurmountable judicial hurdle--to better enforcement of constitutional social welfare rights.
| Author | : Ellie Palmer |
| Publisher | : Bloomsbury Publishing |
| Total Pages | : 384 |
| Release | : 2007-08-31 |
| Genre | : Law |
| ISBN | : 1847313760 |
Download Judicial Review, Socio-Economic Rights and the Human Rights Act Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle
In the United Kingdom during the past decade, individuals and groups have increasingly tested the extent to which principles of English administrative law can be used to gain entitlements to health and welfare services and priority for the needs of vulnerable and disadvantaged groups. One of the primary purposes of this book is to demonstrate the extent to which established boundaries of judicial intervention in socio-economic disputes have been altered by the extension of judicial powers in sections 3 and 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998, and through the development of a jurisprudence of positive obligations in the European Convention on Human Rights 1950. Thus, the substantive focus of the book is on developments in the constitutional law of the United Kingdom. However, the book also addresses key issues of theoretical human rights, international and comparative constitutional law. Issues of justiciability in English administrative law have therefore been explored against a background of two factors: a growing acceptance of the need for balance in the protection in modern constitutional arrangements afforded to civil and political rights on the one hand and socio-economic rights on the other hand; and controversy as to whether courts could make a more effective contribution to the protection of socio-economic rights with the assistance of appropriately tailored constitutional provisions.
| Author | : Aileen Kavanagh |
| Publisher | : Cambridge University Press |
| Total Pages | : 470 |
| Release | : 2009-05-07 |
| Genre | : Law |
| ISBN | : 1139488961 |
Download Constitutional Review under the UK Human Rights Act Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle
Under the Human Rights Act, British courts are for the first time empowered to review primary legislation for compliance with a codified set of fundamental rights. In this book, Aileen Kavanagh argues that the HRA gives judges strong powers of constitutional review, similar to those exercised by the courts under an entrenched Bill of Rights. The aim of the book is to subject the leading case-law under the HRA to critical scrutiny, whilst remaining sensitive to the deeper constitutional, political and theoretical questions which underpin it. Such questions include the idea of judicial deference, the constitutional status of the HRA, the principle of parliamentary sovereignty and the constitutional division of labour between Parliament and the courts. The book closes with a sustained defence of the legitimacy of constitutional review in a democracy, thus providing a powerful rejoinder to those who are sceptical about judicial power under the HRA.
| Author | : Alan D. P. Brady |
| Publisher | : Cambridge University Press |
| Total Pages | : 311 |
| Release | : 2012-05-03 |
| Genre | : Law |
| ISBN | : 1107013003 |
Download Proportionality and Deference Under the UK Human Rights Act Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle
A rigorous analysis of the relationship between proportionality and deference under the Human Rights Act.
| Author | : Grant Huscroft |
| Publisher | : Hart Publishing |
| Total Pages | : 364 |
| Release | : 2002-02 |
| Genre | : Law |
| ISBN | : 1841131946 |
Download Litigating Rights Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle
New Zealand had grappled with issues of constitutional and human rights since the 1980s when, in the late 1990s, jurists invited colleagues from there and abroad to a conference called Liberty, Equality, Community: Constitutional Rights in Conflict. The 17 essays here combine revised versions of the presentations there with additional contributions solicited afterwards. They cover judicial review and bills of rights, liberty and equality, group and indigenous rights, and internationalism. Distributed in the US by ISBS. Annotation copyrighted by Book News, Inc., Portland, OR
| Author | : Jonathan Auburn |
| Publisher | : OUP Oxford |
| Total Pages | : 8561 |
| Release | : 2013-03-21 |
| Genre | : Law |
| ISBN | : 019166572X |
Download Judicial Review Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle
Covering all of the substantive grounds on which a claim may be brought, this definitive new work provides unrivalled analysis and guidance on the law of judicial review. Written by three experienced practitioners, Judicial Review: Principles and Procedure includes chapters on the most common grounds for bringing a claim, such as procedural fairness and irrationality, but also covers emerging grounds such as delay on the part of public bodies and error of fact. In addition, the authors provide a separate, detailed treatment of areas such as administrative policies and the public sector equality duty. Each element of this complex area of law is carefully broken down to ensure that answers are always easy to find and, where the law is in doubt, the dispute is concisely stated and the view most likely to be preferred by the courts is expressed. The book analyses in detail the issues that are likely to arise in practice, with thorough and up-to-date reference to case law throughout. It incorporates the jurisprudence arising out of the Human Rights Act 1998, providing practitioners with a complete yet practical treatment of each relevant topic. The book contains comprehensive coverage of procedural matters in each stage of a claim, from pre-action to costs, and includes a chapter on European Union law from Marie Demetriou QC of Brick Court Chambers, providing a uniquely full treatment of all the issues which might be encountered in practice.
| Author | : Gerhard van der Schyff |
| Publisher | : Springer Science & Business Media |
| Total Pages | : 332 |
| Release | : 2010-06-16 |
| Genre | : Law |
| ISBN | : 9048190029 |
Download Judicial Review of Legislation Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle
Constitutionalism is the permanent quest to control state power, of which the judicial review of legislation is a prime example. Although the judicial review of legislation is increasingly common in modern societies, it is not a finished project. This device still raises questions as to whether judicial review is justified, and how it may be structured. Yet, judicial review’s justification and its scope are seldom addressed in the same study, thereby making for an inconvenient divorce of these two related avenues of study. To narrow the divide, the object of this work is quite straightforward. Namely, is the idea of judicial review defensible, and what influences its design and scope? This book addresses these matters by comparing the judicial review of legislation in the United Kingdom (the Human Rights Act of 1998), the Netherlands (the Halsema Proposal of 2002) and the Constitution of South Africa of 1996. These systems present valuable material to study the issues raised by judicial review. The Netherlands is of particular interest as its Constitution still prohibits the constitutional review of acts of parliament, while allowing treaty review of such acts. The Halsema Proposal wants to even out this difference by allowing the courts also to apply constitutional norms to legislation and not only to international norms. The Human Rights Act and the South African Constitution also present interesting questions that will make their study worthwhile. One can think of the issue of dialogue between the legislature and the judiciary. This topic enjoys increased attention in the United Kingdom but is somewhat underexplored in South African thought on judicial review. These and similar issues are studied in each of the three systems, to not only gain a better understanding of the systems as such, but also of judicial review in general.
| Author | : Richard Bellamy |
| Publisher | : Cambridge University Press |
| Total Pages | : 280 |
| Release | : 2007-09-13 |
| Genre | : Political Science |
| ISBN | : 1139467913 |
Download Political Constitutionalism Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle
Judicial review by constitutional courts is often presented as a necessary supplement to democracy. This book questions its effectiveness and legitimacy. Drawing on the republican tradition, Richard Bellamy argues that the democratic mechanisms of open elections between competing parties and decision-making by majority rule offer superior and sufficient methods for upholding rights and the rule of law. The absence of popular accountability renders judicial review a form of arbitrary rule which lacks the incentive structure democracy provides to ensure rulers treat the ruled with equal concern and respect. Rights based judicial review undermines the constitutionality of democracy. Its counter-majoritarian bias promotes privileged against unprivileged minorities, while its legalism and focus on individual cases distort public debate. Rather than constraining democracy with written constitutions and greater judicial oversight, attention should be paid to improving democratic processes through such measures as reformed electoral systems and enhanced parliamentary scrutiny.
