Is Institutional Ownership Related To Corporate Social Responsibility The Non Linear Relation And Its Implication For Stock Return Volatility PDF Download

Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Is Institutional Ownership Related To Corporate Social Responsibility The Non Linear Relation And Its Implication For Stock Return Volatility PDF full book. Access full book title Is Institutional Ownership Related To Corporate Social Responsibility The Non Linear Relation And Its Implication For Stock Return Volatility.

Is Institutional Ownership Related to Corporate Social Responsibility? The Non-Linear Relation and Its Implication for Stock Return Volatility

Is Institutional Ownership Related to Corporate Social Responsibility? The Non-Linear Relation and Its Implication for Stock Return Volatility
Author: Maretno A. Harjoto
Publisher:
Total Pages: 63
Release: 2015
Genre:
ISBN:
GET BOOK

Download Is Institutional Ownership Related to Corporate Social Responsibility? The Non-Linear Relation and Its Implication for Stock Return Volatility Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

This study examines the relation between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and institutional investor ownership, and the impact of this relation on stock return volatility. We find that institutional ownership does not strictly increase or decrease in CSR; rather, institutional ownership is a concave function of CSR. This evidence suggests that institutional investors do not see CSR as strictly value enhancing activities. Institutional investors adjust their percentage of ownership when CSR activities go beyond the perceived optimal level. Employing the path analysis, we also examine the mediating effect of institutional ownership on the relation between CSR and stock return volatility. We find that CSR decreases stock return volatility at a decreasing rate through its effect on institutional ownership. Our results remain robust under several different CSR measures and estimation methods.

Institutional Ownership and Corporate Social Responsibility

Institutional Ownership and Corporate Social Responsibility
Author: Maretno A. Harjoto
Publisher:
Total Pages: 67
Release: 2015
Genre:
ISBN:
GET BOOK

Download Institutional Ownership and Corporate Social Responsibility Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

This study examines the relation between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and institutional investor ownership, and the impact of this relation on stock return volatility. We find that institutional ownership does not strictly increase or decrease in CSR; rather, institutional ownership is a concave function of CSR. This evidence suggests that institutional investors do not see CSR as strictly value enhancing activities. Institutional investors adjust their percentage of ownership when CSR activities go beyond the perceived optimal level. Employing the path analysis, we also examine the mediating effect of institutional ownership on the relation between CSR and stock return volatility. We find that CSR decreases stock return volatility at a decreasing rate through its effect on institutional ownership. Our results remain robust under several different CSR measures and estimation methods.

Institutional Ownership and Corporate Social Responsibility

Institutional Ownership and Corporate Social Responsibility
Author: Kiyoung Chang
Publisher:
Total Pages: 57
Release: 2016
Genre:
ISBN:
GET BOOK

Download Institutional Ownership and Corporate Social Responsibility Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

This paper investigates the impact of the ownership by institutional investors who are geographically close (local) and have long-term investment horizons (long-term) on corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities. Using a panel data of S&P 500 firms over the period between 1995 and 2009, we show a differential relation between corporate social performance (CSP) and long-term institutional investors that varies in geographic proximity to the firms they invest in. Specifically, long-term institutional ownership that is geographically proximate (local) is associated with higher corporate social performance, especially CSR strengths, while non-local long-term institutional ownership is not associated with CSR strengths. The positive relation between local long-term institutional ownership and CSP is more pronounced in firms where the dealing of soft information, which is hard to quantify, is necessary. The results are robust to various tests and are consistent with the Stakeholder Salience Theory premises, as local long-term institutional owners are stakeholders with high salience.

Which Corporate Social Deeds Matter? Evidence From the Motivated Institutional Ownership

Which Corporate Social Deeds Matter? Evidence From the Motivated Institutional Ownership
Author: Jiun-Lin Chen
Publisher:
Total Pages: 53
Release: 2018
Genre:
ISBN:
GET BOOK

Download Which Corporate Social Deeds Matter? Evidence From the Motivated Institutional Ownership Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

Among the 41 items from five corporate social responsibility dimensions: community, diversity, employee relations, environment, and human rights, we examine which corporate social deeds influence institutional investors' motivated equity ownership most in the U.S. We find that enforcing gay-friendly policies significantly increases the motivated institutional ownership while fairly treating the unionized workforce reduces the motivated institutional ownership after we take the endogeneity issue into consideration. Our further analysis suggests that firms' innovative activities may contribute to this result. In addition, our finding suggests that independent institutional investors avoid corporate social deeds decreasing a firm's profitability more than grey institutional investors. Furthermore, we find that failing to protect the environment and having bad relations with indigenous peoples attract more diversified and short-term institutions than dedicated and long-term institutions. Finally, stocks with a higher CSR-determined motivated institutional ownership earn a positive risk-adjusted return of 0.21% per month, suggesting that firms can adjust their corporate social deeds to attract more motivated institutional ownership and increase the demand for their stocks. Collectively, our evidence suggests that economic considerations outweigh social values in driving institutional investors' preferences for corporate social responsibility activities.

The Rise of Fiduciary Capitalism

The Rise of Fiduciary Capitalism
Author: James P. Hawley
Publisher: University of Pennsylvania Press
Total Pages: 268
Release: 2000-10-06
Genre: Business & Economics
ISBN: 9780812235630
GET BOOK

Download The Rise of Fiduciary Capitalism Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

Traces the rise of public and private pension funds, which now control as much as 50 percent of the equity in American corporations, and argues that shareholders in those funds could use their power to make corporations more responsive to social needs.

Institutional Ownership and Stock Price Crash Risk

Institutional Ownership and Stock Price Crash Risk
Author:
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
Total Pages: 51
Release: 2024-07-19
Genre: Business & Economics
ISBN: 3389050426
GET BOOK

Download Institutional Ownership and Stock Price Crash Risk Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

Master's Thesis from the year 2024 in the subject Business economics - Investment and Finance, grade: 1,7, University of Hamburg, language: English, abstract: This study uses OLS regressions to analyze the impact of institutional ownership (IO) investment horizons on stock price synchronicity and crash risk for a sample of U.S. companies. Two main hypotheses are tested: (1) long-term (short-term) IO (LTIO) (STIO) are negatively (positively) related to stock price synchronicity, and (2) long-term (short-term) IO are negatively (positively) related stock price crash risk. Stock price synchronicity (SYNCH) measures how much firm-specific returns align with overall market returns, while crash risk (NCSKEW, DUVOL, COUNT) indicates the likelihood of a sudden, significant price drop. The theory posits that short-term investors, more prone to sell shares, provide weaker oversight, giving managers more freedom to influence cash flows and increasing synchronicity. In contrast, long-term investors establish stronger management relationships, reducing synchronicity through enhanced oversight. The findings reveal that both long-term and short-term IO positively impact synchronicity, contradicting the hypothesis for long-term IO. This aligns with literature suggesting institutional investors use superior information mainly for trading rather than management engagement. For crash risk, results support the agency theory: long-term IO is associated with reduced crash risk due to better monitoring, while short-term IO correlates with higher crash risk due to frequent trading and weaker oversight. These findings align with prior research, indicating that bad news is disclosed under long-term monitoring, causing abrupt price drops. During the 2008 financial crisis, average crash risk was significantly higher, especially for financial firms. The interaction between IO horizons and the crisis suggests complex dynamics needing further study, particularly the negative interaction of long-term and aggregated IO during recessions. Robustness checks, including firm fixed-effects regressions and variable changes, confirm primary findings but suggest cautious interpretation for long-term IO results. Limitations include a relatively short observation period (2000-2017), potential measurement biases in tax avoidance proxies (long-run cash effective tax rate (LRETR)), and unaddressed endogeneity concerns. Future research should explore evolving ownership structures, corporate social responsibility, and impacts of recent disruptions like the COVID-19 pandemic on crash risk.

Institutional Ownership Horizon, Corporate Social Responsibility and Shareholder Value

Institutional Ownership Horizon, Corporate Social Responsibility and Shareholder Value
Author: Otgontsetseg Erhemjamts
Publisher:
Total Pages: 61
Release: 2019
Genre:
ISBN:
GET BOOK

Download Institutional Ownership Horizon, Corporate Social Responsibility and Shareholder Value Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

A widely held view among policymakers, corporate executives and the media is that short-termism among institutional investors is increasingly prevalent. However, some institutional investors are increasingly vocal about taking a long-term approach, and these investors care about environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues. The reality is that investors are a diverse set of stakeholders with various objectives and time horizons. In the academic literature, empirical evidence on the relationship between institutional ownership horizon and corporate social responsibility (CSR) has been mixed. In this paper, we show that institutions with longer (shorter) investment horizons promote (discourage) CSR at the firm level. In addition, the higher the proportion of long-term (short-term) investors, the higher (lower) the effect of CSR on long-term (short-term) buy-and-hold returns. These findings are consistent with the view that short-termism on the part of institutional investors places short-term pressure on companies, and therefore discourages long-term investments that create value.

Institutional Investors and Corporate Social Responsibility

Institutional Investors and Corporate Social Responsibility
Author: John R. Nofsinger
Publisher:
Total Pages: 52
Release: 2019
Genre:
ISBN:
GET BOOK

Download Institutional Investors and Corporate Social Responsibility Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

Institutional investors appear to have selective preferences regarding corporate social responsibility. They appear indifferent to the presence of positive environmental (E) and social (S) indicators, but underweight stocks with negative ES indicators. This asymmetric pattern is particularly strong for longer-horizon institutions. Our empirical analyses indicate that this pattern is likely driven by economic incentives as the presence of negative ES indicators reflect downside risks: higher stock return skewness and probability of eventual bankruptcy and/or delisting. Positive ES indicators seem irrelevant in this context. Time-varying economic incentives also drive the dynamic pattern of institutional ownership of stocks with static negative indicators due to their controversial products (e.g., tobacco and firearms).

Impact of Corporate Ownership on Risk-Taking and Returns at Thrift Institutions

Impact of Corporate Ownership on Risk-Taking and Returns at Thrift Institutions
Author: Walter Dolde
Publisher:
Total Pages: 0
Release: 2006
Genre:
ISBN:
GET BOOK

Download Impact of Corporate Ownership on Risk-Taking and Returns at Thrift Institutions Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

This paper examines the relationship between ownership structure, other corporate governance variables, and firm risk-taking and returns for the period 1990 to 2003. Our results suggest that the persistent, underlying relationship between insider ownership and risk-taking is U-shaped for both stock and operating returns. The Sharpe ratio for operating returns exhibits an inverted U-shaped association with insider ownership. These observations are consistent with insiders achieving the efficient frontier between risk and return, i.e. although risk-taking varies with the level of ownership, average returns are higher when risk is higher. We also find strong evidence of negative linear relationships between institutional ownership and both operating and stock volatility and positive relationships with operating returns and Tier 1 capital.