Iran As Imagined Nation PDF Download

Personal and collective identities are transformed by processes of dispersion from a homeland. I argue that the meanings dispersed individuals attach to experiences and events and the ways that they imagine personal and national identity are re-narrated and re-imagined in the new social contexts of societies of settlement. In the cases of migrants and dispersed individuals that maintain antagonistic relationships with their homeland regimes, I further argue that processes of identity formation are complicated by the additional challenges of articulating and representing a collective identity that creates distance from stigmatizing associations with the homeland regime. This research uses multiple qualitative methods to compare the identity narratives of first-generation Iranians in Los Angeles and Toronto engaged with local Iranian communities. Because most dispersed Iranians in North America left Iran in the aftermath of a revolution and continue to express hostility toward the Islamic Republic of Iran, they provide an ideal case for this research. My findings indicate that Iranians in both cities are neither selectively assimilating nor retaining identities unaltered by experiences of dispersion. Instead, interview participants expressed strong attachments to the Iranian nation and distance from the Iranian state. This suggests the formation of new identity narratives synthesized from pre-dispersion class and political backgrounds and post-dispersion social contexts. In Los Angeles, the dominance of pre-revolutionary elites and hostile social contexts of reception have encouraged the formation of a hegemonic identity narrative emphasizing secular and pre-Islamic dimensions of Iranian culture. In contrast, the diverse sociopolitical backgrounds of Iranians in Toronto and a social context in which Iranian nationality is less tarnished have produced a pluralist atmosphere in which dissimilar identities exist without a dominant narrative. In both cities there was a shared narrative of distance from the Islamic dimensions of Iranian cultural identity which stems, in part, from continuing antagonistic relationships with the Islamic Republic of Iran. These findings indicate that a narrative approach can usefully reframe the study of personal and collective identities among dispersed groups to reveal both continuities with pre-existing positionalities as well as responsiveness to changing social contexts. Furthermore, a comparative approach focuses attention on the role of social contexts in the shaping of divergent identities within a single national-origin group. Finally, this research provides a framework for analyzing the unique positionality of dispersed groups with hostile relationships to their homeland states seeking to articulate alternative visions of collective national identity.