Dialog Theory For Critical Argumentation PDF Download

Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Dialog Theory For Critical Argumentation PDF full book. Access full book title Dialog Theory For Critical Argumentation.

Dialog Theory for Critical Argumentation

Dialog Theory for Critical Argumentation
Author: Douglas N. Walton
Publisher: John Benjamins Publishing
Total Pages: 329
Release: 2007-09-19
Genre: Language Arts & Disciplines
ISBN: 9027292000

Download Dialog Theory for Critical Argumentation Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

Because of the need to devise systems for electronic communication on the internet, multi-agent computing is moving to a model of communication as a structured conversation between rational agents. For example, in multi-agent systems, an electronic agent searches around the internet, and collects certain kinds of information by asking questions to other agents. Such agents also reason with each other when they engage in negotiation and persuasion. It is shown in this book that critical argumentation is best represented in this framework by the model of reasoned argument called a dialog, in which two or more parties engage in a polite and orderly exchange with each other according to rules governed by conversation policies. In such dialog argumentation, the two parties reason together by taking turns asking questions, offering replies, and offering reasons to support a claim. They try to settle their disagreements by an orderly conversational exchange that is partly adversarial and partly collaborative.


Dialog Theory for Critical Argumentation

Dialog Theory for Critical Argumentation
Author: Douglas N. Walton
Publisher: John Benjamins Publishing
Total Pages: 336
Release: 2007
Genre: Language Arts & Disciplines
ISBN: 9789027218858

Download Dialog Theory for Critical Argumentation Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

Because of the need to devise systems for electronic communication on the internet, multi-agent computing is moving to a model of communication as a structured conversation between rational agents. For example, in multi-agent systems, an electronic agent searches around the internet, and collects certain kinds of information by asking questions to other agents. Such agents also reason with each other when they engage in negotiation and persuasion. It is shown in this book that critical argumentation is best represented in this framework by the model of reasoned argument called a dialog, in which two or more parties engage in a polite and orderly exchange with each other according to rules governed by conversation policies. In such dialog argumentation, the two parties reason together by taking turns asking questions, offering replies, and offering reasons to support a claim. They try to settle their disagreements by an orderly conversational exchange that is partly adversarial and partly collaborative.


Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation

Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation
Author: Douglas Walton
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Total Pages: 368
Release: 2006
Genre: Philosophy
ISBN: 9780521823197

Download Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation presents the basic tools for the identification, analysis, and evaluation of common arguments for beginners. The book teaches by using examples of arguments in dialogues, both in the text itself and in the exercises. Examples of controversial legal, political, and ethical arguments are analyzed. Illustrating the most common kinds of arguments, the book also explains how to analyze and evaluate each kind by critical questioning. Douglas Walton shows how arguments can be reasonable under the right dialogue conditions by using critical questions to evaluate them.


Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory

Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory
Author: Frans H. van Eemeren
Publisher: Routledge
Total Pages: 439
Release: 2013-11-05
Genre: Language Arts & Disciplines
ISBN: 1136688048

Download Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

Argumentation theory is a distinctly multidisciplinary field of inquiry. It draws its data, assumptions, and methods from disciplines as disparate as formal logic and discourse analysis, linguistics and forensic science, philosophy and psychology, political science and education, sociology and law, and rhetoric and artificial intelligence. This presents the growing group of interested scholars and students with a problem of access, since it is even for those active in the field not common to have acquired a familiarity with relevant aspects of each discipline that enters into this multidisciplinary matrix. This book offers its readers a unique comprehensive survey of the various theoretical contributions which have been made to the study of argumentation. It discusses the historical works that provide the background to the field and all major approaches and trends in contemporary research. Argument has been the subject of systematic inquiry for twenty-five hundred years. It has been graced with theories, such as formal logic or the legal theory of evidence, that have acquired a more or less settled provenance with regard to specific issues. But there has been nothing to date that qualifies as a unified general theory of argumentation, in all its richness and complexity. This being so, the argumentation theorist must have access to materials and methods that lie beyond his or her "home" subject. It is precisely on this account that this volume is offered to all the constituent research communities and their students. Apart from the historical sections, each chapter provides an economical introduction to the problems and methods that characterize a given part of the contemporary research program. Because the chapters are self-contained, they can be consulted in the order of a reader's interests or research requirements. But there is value in reading the work in its entirety. Jointly authored by the very people whose research has done much to define the current state of argumentation theory and to point the way toward more general and unified future treatments, this book is an impressively authoritative contribution to the field.


A Systematic Theory of Argumentation

A Systematic Theory of Argumentation
Author: Frans H. van Eemeren
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Total Pages: 228
Release: 2004
Genre: Language Arts & Disciplines
ISBN: 9780521537728

Download A Systematic Theory of Argumentation Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

In this book two of the leading figures in argumentation theory present a view of argumentation as a means of resolving differences of opinion by testing the acceptability of the disputed positions. Their model of a 'critical discussion' serves as a theoretical tool for analyzing, evaluating and producing argumentative discourse. This is a major contribution to the study of argumentation and will be of particular value to professionals and graduate students in speech communication, informal logic, rhetoric, critical thinking, linguistics, and philosophy.


Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation

Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation
Author: J. Anthony Blair
Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media
Total Pages: 360
Release: 2011-10-20
Genre: Philosophy
ISBN: 9400723636

Download Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

J. Anthony Blair is a prominent international figure in argumentation studies. He is among the originators of informal logic, an author of textbooks on the informal logic approach to argument analysis and evaluation and on critical thinking, and a founder and editor of the journal Informal Logic. Blair is widely recognized among the leaders in the field for contributing formative ideas to the argumentation literature of the last few decades. This selection of key works provides insights into the history of the field of argumentation theory and various related disciplines. It illuminates the central debates and presents core ideas in four main areas: Critical Thinking, Informal Logic, Argument Theory and Logic, Dialectic and Rhetoric.


Handbook of Legal Reasoning and Argumentation

Handbook of Legal Reasoning and Argumentation
Author: Giorgio Bongiovanni
Publisher: Springer
Total Pages: 764
Release: 2018-07-02
Genre: Philosophy
ISBN: 9048194520

Download Handbook of Legal Reasoning and Argumentation Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

This handbook addresses legal reasoning and argumentation from a logical, philosophical and legal perspective. The main forms of legal reasoning and argumentation are covered in an exhaustive and critical fashion, and are analysed in connection with more general types (and problems) of reasoning. Accordingly, the subject matter of the handbook divides in three parts. The first one introduces and discusses the basic concepts of practical reasoning. The second one discusses the general structures and procedures of reasoning and argumentation that are relevant to legal discourse. The third one looks at their instantiations and developments of these aspects of argumentation as they are put to work in the law, in different areas and applications of legal reasoning.


Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation

Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation
Author: Douglas N. Walton
Publisher:
Total Pages: 343
Release: 2006
Genre: Electronic books
ISBN: 9780511566226

Download Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle


Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective

Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective
Author: Frans H. van Eemeren
Publisher: Springer
Total Pages: 199
Release: 2018-07-27
Genre: Business & Economics
ISBN: 3319953818

Download Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

The book offers a compact but comprehensive introductory overview of the crucial components of argumentation theory. In presenting this overview, argumentation is consistently approached from a pragma-dialectical perspective by viewing it pragmatically as a goal-directed communicative activity and dialectically as part of a regulated critical exchange aimed at resolving a difference of opinion. As a result, the book also systematically explains how the constitutive parts of the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation, which are discussed in a number of separate publications, hang together. The following crucial topics are discussed: (1) argumentation theory as a discipline; (2) the meta-theoretical principles of pragma-dialectics; (3) the model of a critical discussion aimed at resolving a difference of opinion; (4) fallacies as violations of a code of conduct for reasonable argumentative discourse; (5) descriptive research of argumentative reality; (6) analysis as theoretically-motivated reconstruction; (7) strategic manoeuvring aimed at combining achieving effectiveness with maintaining reasonableness; (8) the conventionalization of argumentative practices; (9) prototypical argumentative patterns; (10) pragma-dialectics amidst other approaches. Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective is clearly written and makes argumentation theory understandable to all scholars and advanced students interested in argumentation research.


From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild

From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild
Author: Frans H. van Eemeren
Publisher: Springer Nature
Total Pages: 289
Release: 2019-10-23
Genre: Philosophy
ISBN: 3030283674

Download From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

This volume comprises a selection of contributions to the theorizing about argumentation that have been presented at the 9th conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA), held in Amsterdam in July 2018. The chapters included provide a general theoretical perspective on central topics in argumentation theory, such as argument schemes and the fallacies. Some contributions concentrate on the treatment of the concept of conductive argument. Other contributions are dedicated to specific issues such as the justification of questions, the occurrence of mining relations, the role of exclamatives, argumentative abduction, eudaimonistic argumentation and a typology of logical ways to counter an argument. In a number of cases the theoretical problems addressed are related to a specific type of context, such as the burden of proof in philosophical argumentation, the charge of committing a genetic fallacy in strategic manoeuvring in philosophy, the necessity of community argument, and connection adequacy for arguments with institutional warrants. The volume offers a great deal of diversity in its breadth of coverage of argumentation theory and wide geographic representation from North and South America to Europe and China.