Destruction Of Chemical Munitions At Pueblo Chemical Depot Colorado Final Environmental Impact Statement PDF Download

Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Destruction Of Chemical Munitions At Pueblo Chemical Depot Colorado Final Environmental Impact Statement PDF full book. Access full book title Destruction Of Chemical Munitions At Pueblo Chemical Depot Colorado Final Environmental Impact Statement.

Destruction of Chemical Munitions at Pueblo Chemical Depot, Colorado - Final Environmental Impact Statement

Destruction of Chemical Munitions at Pueblo Chemical Depot, Colorado - Final Environmental Impact Statement
Author: Department of the Army
Publisher: Createspace Independent Pub
Total Pages: 550
Release: 2013-03-09
Genre: History
ISBN: 9781482733143

Download Destruction of Chemical Munitions at Pueblo Chemical Depot, Colorado - Final Environmental Impact Statement Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

Public Law 99-145 and subsequent related legislation requires destruction of the U.S. stockpile of lethal unitary chemical agents and munitions. Furthermore, in 1993 an international treaty, the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), was signed by 65 nations, including the United States. The CWC, which set the deadline for completing destruction of chemical weapons as 10 years following ratification by the required number of nations, received the necessary ratifications on April 29,1997. Thus, the international deadline for destruction of chemical weapons as April 29, 2007. The Army Chemical Stockpile Disposal Program has prepared this Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) to assess the potential health and environmental impacts of the construction, operation, and closure of a facility to destroy the chemical agent and munitions stored at Pueblo Chemical Depot (PCD), Colorado. Four alternatives are addressed in this FEIS for possible use in destruction of the PCD stockpile: (1) baseline incineration, which is currently in use by the Army at Deseret Chemical Depot (DCD), Utah and was used by the Johnston Atoll Chemical Agent Disposal System (JACADS) to destroy the entire stockpile on Johnston Atoll; (2) modified incineration, which is based on lessons learned at JACADS and DCD; (3) chemical neutralization followed by biotreatment, a developing technology that would be initially operated as a pilot test facility; and (4) chemical neutralization followed by super critical water oxidation, which is also under development and would be initially operated as a pilot test facility. The latter two alternatives are also being evaluated in a separate DEIS prepared by the Army Assembled Chemical Weapons Assessment Program (ACWA) as part of four chemical neutralization technologies being considered for pilot testing at PCD and three other chemical munitions storage locations. The data and information obtained from testing and full scale operation of the incineration technology, and available data and information from on-going studies of the neutralization technologies provided by ACWA are analyzed and compared to the extent possible in this FEIS.


Technology Resource Document for the Assembled Chemical Weapons Assessment Environmental Impact Statement. Vol. 4

Technology Resource Document for the Assembled Chemical Weapons Assessment Environmental Impact Statement. Vol. 4
Author:
Publisher:
Total Pages: 130
Release: 2001
Genre:
ISBN:

Download Technology Resource Document for the Assembled Chemical Weapons Assessment Environmental Impact Statement. Vol. 4 Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

This volume of the Technical Resource Document (TRD) for the ''Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Design, Construction and Operation of One or More Pilot Test Facilities for Assembled Chemical Weapons Destruction Technologies at One or More Sites'' (PMACWA 2001c) pertains to the destruction of assembled chemical weapons (ACW) stored at Pueblo Chemical Depot (PCD), located outside Pueblo, Colorado. This volume presents technical and process information on each of the destruction technologies applicable to treatment of the specific ACW stored at PCD. The destruction technologies described are those that have been demonstrated during Phase I of the Assembled Chemical Weapons Assessment (ACWA) demonstration process (see Volume 1).


Destruction of Chemical Munitions at Blue Grass Army Depot, Kentucky - Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume I (Main Report, Appendicies A-J)

Destruction of Chemical Munitions at Blue Grass Army Depot, Kentucky - Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume I (Main Report, Appendicies A-J)
Author: Department of the Army
Publisher: Createspace Independent Pub
Total Pages: 582
Release: 2013-03-09
Genre: History
ISBN: 9781482732931

Download Destruction of Chemical Munitions at Blue Grass Army Depot, Kentucky - Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume I (Main Report, Appendicies A-J) Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

“Destruction of Chemical Munitions at Blue Grass Army Depot, Kentucky – Final Environmental Impact Statement – Volume I (Main Report and Appendices A-J)” (see also “Volume II – Appendix K”) - Public Law 99-145 and subsequent related legislation requires destruction of the U.S. stockpile of lethal unitary chemical agents and munitions. Furthermore, in 1993 an international treaty, the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), was signed by 65 nations, including the United States. The CWC, which set the deadline for completing destruction of chemical weapons as 10 years following ratification by the required number of nations, received the necessary ratifications on April 29,1997. Thus, the international deadline for destruction of chemical weapons is April 29, 2007. The Army Chemical Stockpile Disposal Program has prepared this Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) to assess the potential health and environmental impacts of the construction, operation, and closure of a facility to destroy the chemical agent and munitions stored at Blue Grass Army Depot (BGAD), Kentucky. Four alternatives are addressed in this FEIS for possible use in destruction of the BGAD stockpile: (1) baseline incineration, which is currently in use by the Army at Deseret Chemical Depot (DCD), Utah and was used by the Johnston Atoll Chemical Agent Disposal System (JACADS) to destroy the entire stockpile on Johnston Atoll; (2) chemical neutralization followed by supercritical water oxidation, a developing technology that would be initially operated as a pilot test facility; (3) chemical neutralization followed by supercritical water oxidation and gas phase chemical reduction, a developing technology that would be initially operated as a pilot test facility; and (4) electrochemical oxidation, which is also under development and would be initially operated as a pilot test facility. The latter three alternatives have also been evaluated in a separate EIS prepared by the Army Assembled Chemical Weapons Assessment Program (ACWA) as part of four chemical neutralization technologies being considered for pilot testing at BGAD and three other chemical munitions storage locations. The data and information obtained from testing and full-scale operation of the incineration technology, and available data and information from on-going studies of the technologies provided by ACWA are analyzed and compared to the extent possible in this FEIS.


Disposal of Chemical Agents and Munitions Stored at Pueblo Depot Activity, Colorado. Final, Phase 1: Environmental Report

Disposal of Chemical Agents and Munitions Stored at Pueblo Depot Activity, Colorado. Final, Phase 1: Environmental Report
Author:
Publisher:
Total Pages:
Release: 2001
Genre:
ISBN:

Download Disposal of Chemical Agents and Munitions Stored at Pueblo Depot Activity, Colorado. Final, Phase 1: Environmental Report Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

Under the Chemical Stockpile Disposal Program (CSDP), the US Army proposes to dispose of lethal chemical agents and munitions stored at eight existing Army installations in the continental United States. In 1988, the US Army issued the final programmatic environmental impact statement (FPEIS) for the CSDP. The FPEIS and the subsequent Record of Decision (ROD) identified an on-site disposal process as the preferred method for destruction of the stockpile. That is, the FPEIS determined the environmentally preferred alternative to be on-site disposal in high-temperature incinerators, while the ROD selected this alternative for implementation as the preferred method for destruction of the stockpile. In this Phase I report, the overall CSDP decision regarding disposal of the PUDA Stockpile is subjected to further analyses, and its validity at PUDA is reviewed with newer, more detailed data than those providing the basis for the conclusions in the FPEIS. The findings of this Phase I report will be factored into the scope of a site-specific environmental impact statement to be prepared for the destruction of the PUDA stockpile. The focus of this Phase I report is on those data identified as having the potential to alter the Army's previous decision regarding disposal of the PUDA stockpile; however, several other factors beyond the scope of this Phase I report must also be acknowledged to have the potential to change or modify the Army's decisions regarding PUDA.


Destruction of Chemical Munitions at Blue Grass Army Depot, Kentucky - Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume II, Appendix K

Destruction of Chemical Munitions at Blue Grass Army Depot, Kentucky - Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume II, Appendix K
Author: Department of the Army
Publisher: Createspace Independent Pub
Total Pages: 280
Release: 2013-03-09
Genre: History
ISBN: 9781482733075

Download Destruction of Chemical Munitions at Blue Grass Army Depot, Kentucky - Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume II, Appendix K Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

“Destruction of Chemical Munitions at Blue Grass Army Depot, Kentucky – Final Environmental Impact Statement – Volume II – Appendix K” (see also “Volume I (Main Report and Appendices A-J)”) Public Law 99-145 and subsequent related legislation requires destruction of the U.S. stockpile of lethal unitary chemical agents and munitions. Furthermore, in 1993 an international treaty, the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), was signed by 65 nations, including the United States. The CWC, which set the deadline for completing destruction of chemical weapons as 10 years following ratification by the required number of nations, received the necessary ratifications on April 29,1997. Thus, the international deadline for destruction of chemical weapons is April 29, 2007. The Army Chemical Stockpile Disposal Program has prepared this Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) to assess the potential health and environmental impacts of the construction, operation, and closure of a facility to destroy the chemical agent and munitions stored at Blue Grass Army Depot (BGAD), Kentucky. Four alternatives are addressed in this FEIS for possible use in destruction of the BGAD stockpile: (1) baseline incineration, which is currently in use by the Army at Deseret Chemical Depot (DCD), Utah and was used by the Johnston Atoll Chemical Agent Disposal System (JACADS) to destroy the entire stockpile on Johnston Atoll; (2) chemical neutralization followed by supercritical water oxidation, a developing technology that would be initially operated as a pilot test facility; (3) chemical neutralization followed by supercritical water oxidation and gas phase chemical reduction, a developing technology that would be initially operated as a pilot test facility; and (4) electrochemical oxidation, which is also under development and would be initially operated as a pilot test facility. The latter three alternatives have also been evaluated in a separate EIS prepared by the Army Assembled Chemical Weapons Assessment Program (ACWA) as part of four chemical neutralization technologies being considered for pilot testing at BGAD and three other chemical munitions storage locations. The data and information obtained from testing and full-scale operation of the incineration technology, and available data and information from on-going studies of the technologies provided by ACWA are analyzed and compared to the extent possible in this FEIS.