Delay In The Regulatory Process PDF Download

Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Delay In The Regulatory Process PDF full book. Access full book title Delay In The Regulatory Process.

Delay in the Regulatory Process

Delay in the Regulatory Process
Author: Committee on Government Operations, United States Senate
Publisher:
Total Pages:
Release: 1977
Genre:
ISBN:

Download Delay in the Regulatory Process Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle


Study on Federal Regulation. Vol. 4

Study on Federal Regulation. Vol. 4
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Governmental Affairs
Publisher:
Total Pages: 251
Release: 1977
Genre: Government productivity
ISBN:

Download Study on Federal Regulation. Vol. 4 Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle


Authorizing the Printing of the Committee Print Entitled "Study on Federal Regulation, Volume IV, Delay in the Regulatory Process" as a Senate Document

Authorizing the Printing of the Committee Print Entitled
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Rules and Administration
Publisher:
Total Pages: 2
Release: 1977
Genre: Documents, Printing of
ISBN:

Download Authorizing the Printing of the Committee Print Entitled "Study on Federal Regulation, Volume IV, Delay in the Regulatory Process" as a Senate Document Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle


Regulatory Review: Delay of Effective Dates of Final Rules Subject to the Administration's January 20, 2001, Memorandum

Regulatory Review: Delay of Effective Dates of Final Rules Subject to the Administration's January 20, 2001, Memorandum
Author:
Publisher:
Total Pages: 52
Release: 2002
Genre:
ISBN:

Download Regulatory Review: Delay of Effective Dates of Final Rules Subject to the Administration's January 20, 2001, Memorandum Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

At the start of the Bush administration, as in other recent new administrations, there 1 were hundreds of federal regulations at various stages of the rulemaking process. Some were about to be sent to the Office of the Federal Register (OFR)for publication in the Federal Register, some had been sent to OFR but had not been published, and others had been published in the Federal Register but had not taken effect. Citing the desire to ensure that the President s appointees have the opportunity to review any new or pending regulations, on January 20,2001,Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff Andrew H. Card, Jr.sent a memorandum (Card memorandum)to the heads and acting heads of all executive departments and agencies generally directing them to (1)not send proposed or final regulations to OFR, (2)withdraw from OFR regulations that had been sent to the Office but not yet published in the Federal Register, and (3)postpone for 60 days the effective date of regulations that had been published in the Federal Register but had not yet taken effect. The Card memorandum instructed the officials to exclude any regulations that were promulgated pursuant to statutory or judicial deadlines, and to identify any such exclusions to the Director of the Office of Management Budget (OMB). It also said that agencies should notify the OMB Director of any regulations that should be excluded because they impact critical health and safety functions of the agency, and that the Director would determine whether the exception was appropriate. Although the Card memorandum did not expressly cover independent regulatoryagencies, it said that those agencies were encouraged to participate voluntarily in this review.


Study on Federal Regulation. Prepared Pursuant to S. Res. 71 to Authorize a Study of the Purpose and Current Effectiveness of Certain Federal Agencies. Committee on Governmental Affairs, United States Senate. Volume IV. Delay in the Regulatory Process. July 1977. October 31, 1977. -- Ordered to be Printed

Study on Federal Regulation. Prepared Pursuant to S. Res. 71 to Authorize a Study of the Purpose and Current Effectiveness of Certain Federal Agencies. Committee on Governmental Affairs, United States Senate. Volume IV. Delay in the Regulatory Process. July 1977. October 31, 1977. -- Ordered to be Printed
Author:
Publisher:
Total Pages:
Release: 1977
Genre:
ISBN:

Download Study on Federal Regulation. Prepared Pursuant to S. Res. 71 to Authorize a Study of the Purpose and Current Effectiveness of Certain Federal Agencies. Committee on Governmental Affairs, United States Senate. Volume IV. Delay in the Regulatory Process. July 1977. October 31, 1977. -- Ordered to be Printed Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle


Study on Federal Regulation. Prepared Pursuant to S. Res. 71 to Authorize a Study of the Purpose and Current Effectiveness of Certain Federal Agencies. Committee on Governmental Affairs, United States Senate. Volume IV. Delay in the Regulatory Process. July 1977. October 31, 1977. -- Ordered to be Printed

Study on Federal Regulation. Prepared Pursuant to S. Res. 71 to Authorize a Study of the Purpose and Current Effectiveness of Certain Federal Agencies. Committee on Governmental Affairs, United States Senate. Volume IV. Delay in the Regulatory Process. July 1977. October 31, 1977. -- Ordered to be Printed
Author:
Publisher:
Total Pages:
Release: 1977
Genre:
ISBN:

Download Study on Federal Regulation. Prepared Pursuant to S. Res. 71 to Authorize a Study of the Purpose and Current Effectiveness of Certain Federal Agencies. Committee on Governmental Affairs, United States Senate. Volume IV. Delay in the Regulatory Process. July 1977. October 31, 1977. -- Ordered to be Printed Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle


The Impact of Planning and Regulatory Delays for Major Energy Infrastructure

The Impact of Planning and Regulatory Delays for Major Energy Infrastructure
Author: Genaro Longoria
Publisher:
Total Pages:
Release: 2022
Genre:
ISBN:

Download The Impact of Planning and Regulatory Delays for Major Energy Infrastructure Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

Effective planning and regulatory processes ensure orderly energy systems. Often, decisions are not made within mandated time frames or discrete consent processes are infrequent. Where multiple consent processes exist in sequence, a given delay may be compounded. These factors can negatively affect system costs and, ultimately, consumer welfare. This paper uses an Irish case study to quantify these effects utilising a power system model, which is a generation and transmission expansion modelling tool designed to determine optimal investments in generation and transmission infrastructures. We show that delays have meaningful impacts on electricity prices, system emissions, infrastructure investment and system operating costs. While impacts converge once all planning has been completed, deviations occur in the intervening period. Absent a delay, our case study shows that wholesale electricity prices are up to c.10% lower for a given year, while CO2 emissions are up to 3.4% lower. Efficient regulation is therefore important to maximise consumer welfare and minimise cumulative emissions. There is a clear case for undertaking an overarching review of the entire regulatory process, particularly the interface between processes.