Carbon Capture And Sequestration Research Development And Demonstration At The U S Department Of Energy PDF Download

Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Carbon Capture And Sequestration Research Development And Demonstration At The U S Department Of Energy PDF full book. Access full book title Carbon Capture And Sequestration Research Development And Demonstration At The U S Department Of Energy.

Carbon Capture and Sequestration: Research, Development, and Demonstration at the U. S. Department of Energy

Carbon Capture and Sequestration: Research, Development, and Demonstration at the U. S. Department of Energy
Author: Peter Folger
Publisher: Createspace Independent Pub
Total Pages: 30
Release: 2012-07-28
Genre: Political Science
ISBN: 9781478326663

Download Carbon Capture and Sequestration: Research, Development, and Demonstration at the U. S. Department of Energy Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

On March 27, 2012, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed a new rule that would limit emissions to no more than 1,000 pounds of carbon dioxide (CO2) per megawatt-hour of production from new fossil-fuel power plants with a capacity of 25 megawatts or larger. EPA proposed the rule under Section 111 of the Clean Air Act. According to EPA, new natural gas fired combined-cycle power plants should be able to meet the proposed standards without additional cost. However, new coal-fired plants would only be able to meet the standards by installing carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) technology. The proposed rule has sparked increased scrutiny of the future of CCS as a viable technology for reducing CO2 emissions from coal-fired power plants. The proposed rule also places a new focus on whether the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE's) CCS research, development, and demonstration (RD&D) program will achieve its vision of developing an advanced CCS technology portfolio ready by 2020 for large-scale CCS deployment. Congress has appropriated nearly $6 billion since FY2008 for CCS RD&D at DOE's Office of Fossil Energy: approximately $2.3 billion from annual appropriations and $3.4 billion from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (or Recovery Act). The large and rapid influx of funding for industrial-scale CCS projects from the Recovery Act may accelerate development and deployment of CCS in the United States. However, the future deployment of CCS may take a different course if the major components of the DOE program follow a path similar to DOE's flagship CCS demonstration project, FutureGen, which has experienced delays and multiple changes of scope and design since its inception in 2003. A question for Congress is whether FutureGen represents a unique case of a first mover in a complex, expensive, and technically challenging endeavor, or whether it indicates the likely path for all large CCS demonstration projects once they move past the planning stage. Since enactment of the Recovery Act, DOE has shifted its RD&D emphasis to the demonstration phase of carbon capture technology. The shift appears to heed recommendations from many experts who called for large, industrial-scale carbon capture demonstration projects (e.g., 1 million tons of CO2 captured per year). Funding from the Recovery Act for large-scale demonstration projects was 40% of the total amount of DOE funding for all CCS RD&D from FY2008 through FY2012. To date, there are no commercial ventures in the United States that capture, transport, and inject industrial-scale quantities of CO2 solely for the purposes of carbon sequestration. However, CCS RD&D in 2012 is just now embarking on commercial-scale demonstration projects for CO2 capture, injection, and storage. The success of these projects will likely bear heavily on the future outlook for widespread deployment of CCS technologies as a strategy for preventing large quantities of CO2 from reaching the atmosphere while U.S. power plants continue to burn fossil fuels, mainly coal. Given the pending EPA rule, congressional interest in the future of coal as a domestic energy source appears directly linked to the future of CCS. In the short term, congressional support for building new coal-fired power plants could be expressed through legislative action to modify or block the proposed EPA rule. Alternatively, congressional oversight of the CCS RD&D program could help inform decisions about the level of support for the program and help Congress gauge whether it is on track to meet its goals.


National Carbon Dioxide Storage Capacity Assessment Act of 2007, and Department of Energy Carbon Capture and Storage Research, Development, and Demonstration Act of 2007

National Carbon Dioxide Storage Capacity Assessment Act of 2007, and Department of Energy Carbon Capture and Storage Research, Development, and Demonstration Act of 2007
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources
Publisher:
Total Pages: 80
Release: 2007
Genre: Atmospheric carbon dioxide
ISBN:

Download National Carbon Dioxide Storage Capacity Assessment Act of 2007, and Department of Energy Carbon Capture and Storage Research, Development, and Demonstration Act of 2007 Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle


Negative Emissions Technologies and Reliable Sequestration

Negative Emissions Technologies and Reliable Sequestration
Author: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
Publisher: National Academies Press
Total Pages: 511
Release: 2019-04-08
Genre: Science
ISBN: 0309484529

Download Negative Emissions Technologies and Reliable Sequestration Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

To achieve goals for climate and economic growth, "negative emissions technologies" (NETs) that remove and sequester carbon dioxide from the air will need to play a significant role in mitigating climate change. Unlike carbon capture and storage technologies that remove carbon dioxide emissions directly from large point sources such as coal power plants, NETs remove carbon dioxide directly from the atmosphere or enhance natural carbon sinks. Storing the carbon dioxide from NETs has the same impact on the atmosphere and climate as simultaneously preventing an equal amount of carbon dioxide from being emitted. Recent analyses found that deploying NETs may be less expensive and less disruptive than reducing some emissions, such as a substantial portion of agricultural and land-use emissions and some transportation emissions. In 2015, the National Academies published Climate Intervention: Carbon Dioxide Removal and Reliable Sequestration, which described and initially assessed NETs and sequestration technologies. This report acknowledged the relative paucity of research on NETs and recommended development of a research agenda that covers all aspects of NETs from fundamental science to full-scale deployment. To address this need, Negative Emissions Technologies and Reliable Sequestration: A Research Agenda assesses the benefits, risks, and "sustainable scale potential" for NETs and sequestration. This report also defines the essential components of a research and development program, including its estimated costs and potential impact.


Carbon Capture and Sequestration (Ccs) in the United States

Carbon Capture and Sequestration (Ccs) in the United States
Author: Congressional Research Service
Publisher: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform
Total Pages: 24
Release: 2017-09-18
Genre:
ISBN: 9781976493614

Download Carbon Capture and Sequestration (Ccs) in the United States Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

Carbon capture and sequestration (or storage)-known as CCS-is a process that involves capturing man-made carbon dioxide (CO2) at its source and storing it permanently underground. (CCS is sometimes referred to as CCUS-carbon capture, utilization, and storage.) CCS could reduce the amount of CO2-an important greenhouse gas-emitted to the atmosphere from the burning of fossil fuels at power plants and other large industrial facilities. Globally, two fossil-fueled power plants currently generate electricity and capture CO2 in large quantities: the Boundary Dam plant in Canada and the Petra Nova plant in Texas. Both plants retrofitted post-combustion capture technology to units of existing plants. A third fossil-fueled electricity-generating operation, the Kemper County Energy Facility in Mississippi, was scheduled to begin CCS operations by now, but cost overruns and delays in construction and operations led to the suspension of the plant's CCS component on June 28, 2017. Each of the power plants using CCS systems may be referred to as a demonstration project, or a nearly first-of-its-kind venture using technologies developed at a pilot scale ramped up to commercial scale. Such projects move through many phases, from the initial research and development (R&D) phase through the final commercial deployment phase. It is not unusual for projects in the demonstration phase of this process to experience higher-than-anticipated costs, delays, and other challenges. Several other U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)-supported demonstration projects, such as FutureGen, the AEP Mountaineer project, and the Hydrogen Energy California Project, among others, faced challenges that led to their cancellation or suspension. Given the mixed success of large CCS projects in the United States, the economic viability of, and the commercial interest in, such projects remains uncertain. The U.S. Department of Energy has long supported R&D on CCS within its Fossil Energy Research and Development (FER&D) portfolio. The Trump Administration proposed to cut FER&D funding substantially in its FY2018 budget request. The Trump Administration's proposal differs from the policy trends of the previous two Administrations, which supported R&D on CCS and emphasized the development of large-scale demonstration projects to evaluate how CCS might be deployed commercially. Some in Congress have signaled continued support for DOE's R&D efforts with respect to CCS. The House Energy and Water Development appropriations draft legislation would support CCS R&D at a level comparable to that in FY2017, for example ($635 million versus $668 enacted for FY2017). The Senate version of the bill would fund FER&D at $573 million in FY2018, $95 million less than FY2017 but $293 million more than the Administration request. In addition, some Members of Congress have continued to introduce legislation in the 115th Congress intended to advance CCS. These bills include H.R. 2010, H.R. 2011, H.R. 2296, S. 843, S. 1068, and S. 1535. The Obama Administration commissioned a CCS task force, which concluded in 2010 that the largest barrier to long-term demonstration and deployment of CCS technology is the absence of a federal policy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The task force further concluded that widespread deployment of CCS would occur only if the technology is commercially available at economically competitive prices. None of those factors appear to be in place currently, which may indicate that demonstration and deployment of industrial-scale CCS will be delayed compared to earlier projections, pending future policy, technological, and economic developments.


Carbon Capture and Sequestration

Carbon Capture and Sequestration
Author: Peter Folger
Publisher:
Total Pages: 27
Release: 2010-11
Genre:
ISBN: 9781437937794

Download Carbon Capture and Sequestration Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

Carbon capture and sequestration (or storage) ¿ known as CCS ¿ has attracted interest as a measure for mitigating global climate change because large amounts of carbon dioxide (CO2) emitted from fossil fuel use in the U.S. are potentially available to be captured and stored underground or prevented from reaching the atmosphere. Large, industrial sources of CO2, such as electricity-generating plants, are likely initial candidates for CCS because they are predominantly stationary, single-point sources. Contents of this report: (1) Introduction; (2) Capturing CO2; (3) Transportation; (4) Sequestration in Geological Formations; (5) Deep Ocean Sequestration; (6) Mineral Carbonation; (7) Costs for CCS; (8) DoE Carbon Capture and Sequestration Program.


Carbon Capture and Sequestration

Carbon Capture and Sequestration
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources
Publisher:
Total Pages: 80
Release: 2009
Genre: Carbon dioxide mitigation
ISBN:

Download Carbon Capture and Sequestration Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle


Carbon Capture and Sequestration

Carbon Capture and Sequestration
Author: Millett Granger Morgan
Publisher: Routledge
Total Pages: 306
Release: 2012
Genre: Business & Economics
ISBN: 1617261017

Download Carbon Capture and Sequestration Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

The United States produces over seventy per cent of all its electricity from fossil fuels and nearly fifty per cent from coal alone. Worldwide, forty-one per cent of all electricity is generated from coal, making it the single most important fuel source for electricity generation, followed by natural gas. This means that an essential part of any portfolio for greenhouse gas emissions reductions will be technology to capture carbon dioxide and permanently sequester it in suitable geologic formations. While many nations have created incentives to develop of CCS technology, large regulatory and legal barriers exist that must still be addressed. This book identifies current law and regulation that applies to geologic sequestration in the U.S., the regulatory needs to ensure that geologic sequestration is carried out safely and effectively, and barriers that current law and regulation present to timely deployment of CCS. The authors find the three most significant barriers to be: an ill-defined process to access pore space in deep saline formations; a piecemeal, procedural and static permitting system; and the lack of a clear, responsible plan to address long-term liability associated with sequestered CO2. The book provides legislative options to remove these barriers and address the regulatory needs, and makes recommendations on the best options to encourage safe, effective deployment of CCS. The authors propose recommendations in legislative language, which is of particular use to policy makers faced with the challenge of addressing climate change and energy