Argument Inference And Dialectic PDF Download

Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Argument Inference And Dialectic PDF full book. Access full book title Argument Inference And Dialectic.

Argument, Inference and Dialectic

Argument, Inference and Dialectic
Author: R.C. Pinto
Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media
Total Pages: 178
Release: 2013-03-14
Genre: Philosophy
ISBN: 9401707839

Download Argument, Inference and Dialectic Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

This volume contains 12 papers addressed to researchers and advanced students in informal logic and related fields, such as argumentation, formal logic, and communications. Among the issues discussed are attempts to rethink the nature of argument and of inference, the role of dialectical context, and the standards for evaluating inferences, and to shed light on the interfaces between informal logic and argumentation theory, rhetoric, formal logic and cognitive psychology.


Argument, Inference and Dialectic

Argument, Inference and Dialectic
Author: Robert Pinto
Publisher: Springer
Total Pages: 148
Release: 2013-01-07
Genre: Philosophy
ISBN: 9789401707848

Download Argument, Inference and Dialectic Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

This volume contains 12 papers addressed to researchers and advanced students in informal logic and related fields, such as argumentation, formal logic, and communications. Among the issues discussed are attempts to rethink the nature of argument and of inference, the role of dialectical context, and the standards for evaluating inferences, and to shed light on the interfaces between informal logic and argumentation theory, rhetoric, formal logic and cognitive psychology.


Inference in Argumentation

Inference in Argumentation
Author: Eddo Rigotti
Publisher: Springer
Total Pages: 325
Release: 2018-12-10
Genre: Language Arts & Disciplines
ISBN: 3030045684

Download Inference in Argumentation Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

This book investigates the role of inference in argumentation, considering how arguments support standpoints on the basis of different loci. The authors propose and illustrate a model for the analysis of the standpoint-argument connection, called Argumentum Model of Topics (AMT). A prominent feature of the AMT is that it distinguishes, within each and every single argumentation, between an inferential-procedural component, on which the reasoning process is based; and a material-contextual component, which anchors the argument in the interlocutors’ cultural and factual common ground. The AMT explains how these components differ and how they are intertwined within each single argument. This model is introduced in Part II of the book, following a careful reconstruction of the enormously rich tradition of studies on inference in argumentation, from the antiquity to contemporary authors, without neglecting medieval and post-medieval contributions. The AMT is a contemporary model grounded in a dialogue with such tradition, whose crucial aspects are illuminated in this book.


Anyone Who Has a View

Anyone Who Has a View
Author: F.H. van Eemeren
Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media
Total Pages: 538
Release: 2012-12-06
Genre: Philosophy
ISBN: 940071078X

Download Anyone Who Has a View Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

This volume contains a selection of papers from the International Conference on Argumentation (Amsterdam, 2002) by prominent international scholars of argumentation theory. It provides an insightful cross-section of the current state of affairs in argumentation research. It will be of interest to all those working in the field of argumentation theory and to all scholars who are interested in recent developments in this field.


Argument and Inference

Argument and Inference
Author: Gregory Johnson
Publisher: MIT Press
Total Pages: 283
Release: 2017-01-06
Genre: Philosophy
ISBN: 0262337770

Download Argument and Inference Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

A thorough and practical introduction to inductive logic with a focus on arguments and the rules used for making inductive inferences. This textbook offers a thorough and practical introduction to inductive logic. The book covers a range of different types of inferences with an emphasis throughout on representing them as arguments. This allows the reader to see that, although the rules and guidelines for making each type of inference differ, the purpose is always to generate a probable conclusion. After explaining the basic features of an argument and the different standards for evaluating arguments, the book covers inferences that do not require precise probabilities or the probability calculus: the induction by confirmation, inference to the best explanation, and Mill's methods. The second half of the book presents arguments that do require the probability calculus, first explaining the rules of probability, and then the proportional syllogism, inductive generalization, and Bayes' rule. Each chapter ends with practice problems and their solutions. Appendixes offer additional material on deductive logic, odds, expected value, and (very briefly) the foundations of probability. Argument and Inference can be used in critical thinking courses. It provides these courses with a coherent theme while covering the type of reasoning that is most often used in day-to-day life and in the natural, social, and medical sciences. Argument and Inference is also suitable for inductive logic and informal logic courses, as well as philosophy of sciences courses that need an introductory text on scientific and inductive methods.


A Systematic Theory of Argumentation

A Systematic Theory of Argumentation
Author: Frans H. van Eemeren
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Total Pages: 228
Release: 2004
Genre: Language Arts & Disciplines
ISBN: 9780521537728

Download A Systematic Theory of Argumentation Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

In this book two of the leading figures in argumentation theory present a view of argumentation as a means of resolving differences of opinion by testing the acceptability of the disputed positions. Their model of a 'critical discussion' serves as a theoretical tool for analyzing, evaluating and producing argumentative discourse. This is a major contribution to the study of argumentation and will be of particular value to professionals and graduate students in speech communication, informal logic, rhetoric, critical thinking, linguistics, and philosophy.


Arguments and Reason-Giving

Arguments and Reason-Giving
Author: Matthew W McKeon
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Total Pages: 369
Release: 2024-05-21
Genre: Philosophy
ISBN: 0197751636

Download Arguments and Reason-Giving Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

Arguments figure in our everyday practices of giving reasons. For example, we use arguments to advance reasons to explain why we believe or did something, to justify our beliefs or actions, to persuade others to do or to believe something, and to advance reasons to worry or to fear that something is true. This book is about our uses of arguments to advance their premises as reasons for believing their conclusions, i.e., as reasons for believing that their conclusions are true. What, exactly, is involved when you successfully use an argument to advance the premises as reasons for believing the conclusion? Philosopher Matthew W. McKeon suggests there is more involved than one might think.


The New Dialectic

The New Dialectic
Author: Douglas N. Walton
Publisher: University of Toronto Press
Total Pages: 324
Release: 1998-01-01
Genre: Philosophy
ISBN: 9780802079879

Download The New Dialectic Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

Because developments in informal logic have been based, for the most part, on idealized and abstract models, the tools available for argument analysis are not easily adapted to the needs of everyday argumentation. In this book Douglas Walton proposes a new and practical approach to argument analysis based on his theory that different standards for argument must apply in the case of different types of dialogue. By refining and extending the existing formal classifications of dialogue, Walton shows that each dialogue type, be it inquiry, negotiation, or critical discussion, has its own set of goals. He goes on to demonstrate that an argument can best be evaluated in terms of its contribution, positive or negative, to the goals of the particular dialogue it is meant to further. In this way he illustrates how argument can be brought into the service of many types of dialogue, and thus has valuable uses that go well beyond the mere settling of disputes and differences. By reaching back to the Aristotelian roots of logic as an applied, practical discipline and by formulating a new framework of rationality for evaluating arguments, Douglas Walton restores a much-needed balance to argument analysis. This book complements and extends his Argument Structure: A Pragmatic Theory (University of Toronto Press, 1996).


Plausible Argument in Everyday Conversation

Plausible Argument in Everyday Conversation
Author: Douglas Walton
Publisher: State University of New York Press
Total Pages: 340
Release: 1992-11-03
Genre: Philosophy
ISBN: 1438423233

Download Plausible Argument in Everyday Conversation Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

This book provides a practical and accessible way of evaluating good and bad arguments used in everyday conversations by applying normative models of dialectical (interactive) argumentation, where two parties reason together in an orderly and cooperative way. Using case studies, the author analyzes correct and incorrect uses of argumentation on controversial issues that engage the reader's interest while illustrating points in a practical way. Walton gives clear explanations of the most common errors and tricky deceptions — traditionally called "fallacies" — that can trip up an unwary arguer.