A History Of American Gifted Education PDF Download

The purpose of this historical study was to examine the conceptual history of gifted education, the emergence of acceleration programs and to seek an understanding of the current perceptions of gifted education by using the lens of the past. A systematic review of the literature, presented by major proponents in the field of giftedness, suggests that minimal attention has been given to the foundational years of these concepts. Expressed to the reader in a prose narrative, the study employed a combination of historical and descriptive research that formed conclusions, which drew the data together into a fashioning of written history (Barzun & Graff, 1985). Four research objectives were the focus: (1) to conduct an historical investigation, using both chronicle and explanatory perspectives, of gifted education and the American educational system, (2) to identify pioneers, theoretical foundations and critical influences on gifted education, (3) to explore the educational options for gifted learners and (4) to summarize the legislative impact on gifted education. This study addressed the historical perspectives and foundation of the gifted child movement in this country; the delineation of the important pioneers in the field, and program flexibility in the education of talented students. Findings revealed the significance of defining giftedness, the importance of acceleration as the promise for the gifted, and the benefits to high school students as a result of better collaboration between secondary institutions and colleges. A review of the literature determined that gifted education remains a very contentious issue, both educationally and politically. This debate, which speaks to education being designed to serve the needs of society, as opposed to addressing the needs of the individual student continues today. The curriculum reforms offered to students of high intellect were initially met with great praise. It was thought that by raising the bar for the brightest students, the bar would be equally raised for all students. This resulted in an increase in student participation in acceleration programs. However, the programs are not without criticism. Therefore, the cycle progresses with praise and criticism, but one thing is clear; despite dramatic growth, there is still a great need for more research. (Contains 3 tables and 6 appendices.) [Ed.D. Dissertation, Bowie State University].