The Effect Of Sugarbeet Beta Vulgaris L On Nitrogen Fertilization Of Subsequent Wheat Triticum Aestivum L And The Fate Of Labeled Fertilizer Nitrogen In The Cropping Sequence PDF Download

Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download The Effect Of Sugarbeet Beta Vulgaris L On Nitrogen Fertilization Of Subsequent Wheat Triticum Aestivum L And The Fate Of Labeled Fertilizer Nitrogen In The Cropping Sequence PDF full book. Access full book title The Effect Of Sugarbeet Beta Vulgaris L On Nitrogen Fertilization Of Subsequent Wheat Triticum Aestivum L And The Fate Of Labeled Fertilizer Nitrogen In The Cropping Sequence.

Plant Density, Harvest Date, and Fertilizer Impact on Sugarbeet (Beta Vulgaris L.) Root and Sucrose Yield, N Dynamics, and Profit Margins

Plant Density, Harvest Date, and Fertilizer Impact on Sugarbeet (Beta Vulgaris L.) Root and Sucrose Yield, N Dynamics, and Profit Margins
Author: Amanda DeBruyn
Publisher:
Total Pages:
Release: 2016
Genre:
ISBN:

Download Plant Density, Harvest Date, and Fertilizer Impact on Sugarbeet (Beta Vulgaris L.) Root and Sucrose Yield, N Dynamics, and Profit Margins Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

Local (southwestern Ontario and Michigan) sugarbeet production practices have changed to an earlier harvest date (early/mid Sept. vs. late Oct. early Nov.) and increased plant density (114, 800 plants ha-1 at 57 cm vs. 86, 500 plants ha-1 at a row width of 76 cm) using high yielding glyphosate-resistant sugarbeet varieties. In addition, crop consultants have recommended including N fertilizer in a 5-by-5 cm band during sugarbeet planting. Nutrient management is an essential aspect of crop production, and more specifically, in sugarbeet production as quality and root yield are negatively and positively, respectively, influenced by N fertility. Therefore, the effects of these changes in crop production practices on root and sucrose yield, profit margins, N dynamics, and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) were evaluated at two fields in 2013-2015 with two harvest dates. Application rates of 157 kg N ha-1 to optimize root yield but only 12 kg N ha-1 to optimize recoverable white sucrose per tonne (RWST) were observed at either harvest date. Conversely, profit margins calculated using Michigan Sugar Company (MSC) 5-year average payment standards favour an optimal profit margin application rate of 127-136 kg N ha-1 for early and late harvest, respectively. The effect of harvest date and N and P fertilizer placement, source, and timing was not influential on NUE and N loss indicators and a lack of difference between NUE indices and yield slightly favoured the application of N and P in a 5-by-5 cm band at planting together or alone compared to the zero N-P control. Therefore, results do not contradict current industry recommendations; however, there is no compelling evidence to suggest farmers should modify planters to include N fertilizer at planting unless already capable. Further, plant density and harvest date had no influence on N fertilizer requirements tor most profitable rate of N. However, an early harvest resulted in lower root yield, RWST, and N removal from the field. It is therefore recommended that, under current payment protocols, N fertilizer should be applied at rates 27-57 kg N ha-1 greater than the current application of 100 kg N ha-1 and can be applied at the same rate regardless of harvest date or plant density. However, NUE calculations suggest that an earlier harvest may result in higher risk of N losses compared to late, and as such, growers may wish to harvest later or consider implementing N loss mitigation strategies.


Agrindex

Agrindex
Author:
Publisher:
Total Pages: 776
Release: 1992
Genre: Agriculture
ISBN:

Download Agrindex Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle


Effect of Tillage, Irrigation Amounts, and Nitrogen Rates in Sugar Beet (Beta Vulgaris L.)

Effect of Tillage, Irrigation Amounts, and Nitrogen Rates in Sugar Beet (Beta Vulgaris L.)
Author: Kelli M. Belmont
Publisher:
Total Pages: 164
Release: 2015
Genre: Sugar beet
ISBN: 9781321934472

Download Effect of Tillage, Irrigation Amounts, and Nitrogen Rates in Sugar Beet (Beta Vulgaris L.) Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

Much is not yet clearly understood about the interactive effect of nitrogen (N) fertilizer application rates, irrigation amounts, and tillage level in sugar beet. A 2-year study was conducted near Kimberly, ID to determine the effects of tillage type, irrigation amount, and nitrogen fertilizer rate on sugar beet yield and quality. Three tillage treatments were compared: conventional tillage (CT), strip tillage (ST), and direct seed (DS). Irrigation treatments were established as 50, 100, and 150% of sugar beet evapotranspiration (ET) model CT sugar beet. Four N fertility rates were applied: 60, 80, 100, and 120% of recommended rate for CT sugar beets. By late spray season common lambsquaters and green foxtail densities were the same between CT, ST, and DS at optimum irrigation and N rate. In 2013 leafminer egg and juvenile densities were greatest in CT compared with DS and ST. Averaged over 2 years, root yield was 8.7 and 6.7 Mg ha-1 higher in CT and ST, respectively, than DS, but estimated recoverable sucrose was equal between CT, ST, and DS. Combined results over the 2 years indicated no significant interactions between tillage, irrigation, and N rates suggesting N recommendations do not need to be adjusted for tillage.