Moral Responsibility And Desert Of Praise And Blame PDF Download

Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Moral Responsibility And Desert Of Praise And Blame PDF full book. Access full book title Moral Responsibility And Desert Of Praise And Blame.

Moral Responsibility and Desert of Praise and Blame

Moral Responsibility and Desert of Praise and Blame
Author: Audrey L. Anton
Publisher: Lexington Books
Total Pages: 216
Release: 2015-12-24
Genre: Philosophy
ISBN: 0739191764

Download Moral Responsibility and Desert of Praise and Blame Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

This book challenges a basic assumption held by many responsibility theorists: that agents must be morally responsible in the retrospective sense for anything in virtue of which they deserve praise or blame (the primacy assumption). Anton sets out to defeat this assumption by showing that accepting it as well as the much more intuitive causality assumption renders us incapable of making sense of cases whereby agents seem to deserve praise and blame. She argues that retrospective moral responsibility is a species of causal responsibility (the causality assumption). Then, she illustrates several examples in which agents are not causally responsible for any morally relevant consequences, but they seem to be deserving of praise or blame nonetheless. Anton concludes that such cases are counterexamples to the primacy assumption, and turns her attention towards discerning what grounds desert of praise and blame if not retrospective moral responsibility. Anton advances the moral attitude account, whereby agents deserve praise and blame in virtue of moral attitudes they have in response to moral reasons. These moral attitudes must be sufficiently sincere, which means they reach a threshold that distinguishes such attitudes as eligible for praise and blame. Anton adds that whether one deserves praise or blame and to what degree is sensitive to the agent’s personal moral progress as well as the status quo of her society. This addition brings with it the welcome consequence that morality may be objective, but we are still justified in judging one another charitably based on personal and societal limitations.


Sources and Reasons

Sources and Reasons
Author: Audrey Lauren Anton
Publisher:
Total Pages: 241
Release: 2011
Genre:
ISBN:

Download Sources and Reasons Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

Abstract: This dissertation is an inquiry into the natures of moral responsibility and an agent's worthiness of praise and blame and the relation between these two phenomena. The project commences with a reflection on how contemporary views of moral responsibility and praise-and blameworthiness owe a significant heritage to a division that can be seen in Aristotle's view---that of sourcehood and reasons-responsiveness. Aristotle was one of the first to argue that an agent ought only to be praised or blamed for voluntary behavior. For Aristotle, the voluntary involves the agent's particular knowledge of her situation as well as her control over her behavior as its source. Since Aristotle's presentation of these issues, scholars tend to highlight one of these aspects over the other, indicating which is more central to establishing moral responsibility and the worthiness of praise and blame. Then, I show that contemporary views of each type hold that moral responsibility is prior to (i.e., a precondition for) an agent's worthiness of praise and blame. In my dissertation, I challenge this presumption. First, I show that moral responsibility is a type of causal responsibility. Then I argue that there are instances of agents being praise- and blameworthy that lack a causal element on the part of the agent, thus showing that one need not be morally responsible in order to be worthy of praise or blame. From here, I consider what grounds praise- and blameworthiness, offering my own account, the moral attitude account, which is in part inspired by my interpretation of how Aristotle deemed emotions to be deserving of praise and blame. Finally, I consider the possibility that moral responsibility requires agents to be praise- or blameworthy and I ultimately endorse this claim. I suggest that sourcehood accounts are applicable to moral responsibility only and that reasons-responsiveness accounts are better equipped to incorporate my conclusions into their views.


Against Moral Responsibility

Against Moral Responsibility
Author: Bruce N. Waller
Publisher: MIT Press
Total Pages: 365
Release: 2011-10-14
Genre: Philosophy
ISBN: 0262016591

Download Against Moral Responsibility Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

A vigorous attack on moral responsibility in all its forms argues that the abolition of moral responsibility will be liberating and beneficial. In Against Moral Responsibility, Bruce Waller launches a spirited attack on a system that is profoundly entrenched in our society and its institutions, deeply rooted in our emotions, and vigorously defended by philosophers from ancient times to the present. Waller argues that, despite the creative defenses of it by contemporary thinkers, moral responsibility cannot survive in our naturalistic-scientific system. The scientific understanding of human behavior and the causes that shape human character, he contends, leaves no room for moral responsibility. Waller argues that moral responsibility in all its forms—including criminal justice, distributive justice, and all claims of just deserts—is fundamentally unfair and harmful and that its abolition will be liberating and beneficial. What we really want—natural human free will, moral judgments, meaningful human relationships, creative abilities—would survive and flourish without moral responsibility. In the course of his argument, Waller examines the origins of the basic belief in moral responsibility, proposes a naturalistic understanding of free will, offers a detailed argument against moral responsibility and critiques arguments in favor of it, gives a general account of what a world without moral responsibility would look like, and examines the social and psychological aspects of abolishing moral responsibility. Waller not only mounts a vigorous, and philosophically rigorous, attack on the moral responsibility system, but also celebrates the benefits that would result from its total abolition.


Moral Responsibility Reconsidered

Moral Responsibility Reconsidered
Author: Gregg D. Caruso
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Total Pages: 150
Release: 2022-12-01
Genre: Philosophy
ISBN: 1009219766

Download Moral Responsibility Reconsidered Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

This Element examines the concept of moral responsibility as it is used in contemporary philosophical debates and explores the justifiability of the moral practices associated with it, including moral praise/blame, retributive punishment, and the reactive attitudes of resentment and indignation. After identifying and discussing several different varieties of responsibility-including causal responsibility, take-charge responsibility, role responsibility, liability responsibility, and the kinds of responsibility associated with attributability, answerability, and accountability-it distinguishes between basic and non-basic desert conceptions of moral responsibility and considers a number of skeptical arguments against each. It then outlines an alternative forward-looking account of moral responsibility grounded in non-desert-invoking desiderata such as protection, reconciliation, and moral formation. It concludes by addressing concerns about the practical implications of skepticism about desert-based moral responsibility and explains how optimistic skeptics can preserve most of what we care about when it comes to our interpersonal relationships, morality, and meaning in life.


Building Better Beings

Building Better Beings
Author: Manuel Vargas
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Total Pages: 356
Release: 2013
Genre: Law
ISBN: 019969754X

Download Building Better Beings Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

Manuel Vargas presents a compelling and state-of-the-art defense of moral responsibility in the face of growing philosophical and scientific skepticism about free will and accountability. He shows how we can justify our responsibility practices, and provides a normatively and naturalistically adequate account of agency, blame, and desert.


Rejecting Retributivism

Rejecting Retributivism
Author: Gregg D. Caruso
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Total Pages: 401
Release: 2021-04-29
Genre: Law
ISBN: 1108484700

Download Rejecting Retributivism Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

Caruso argues against retributivism and develops an alternative for addressing criminal behavior that is ethically defensible and practical.


Just Deserts

Just Deserts
Author: Daniel C. Dennett
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons
Total Pages: 145
Release: 2021-01-14
Genre: Philosophy
ISBN: 1509545778

Download Just Deserts Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

The concept of free will is profoundly important to our self-understanding, our interpersonal relationships, and our moral and legal practices. If it turns out that no one is ever free and morally responsible, what would that mean for society, morality, meaning, and the law? Just Deserts brings together two philosophers – Daniel C. Dennett and Gregg D. Caruso – to debate their respective views on free will, moral responsibility, and legal punishment. In three extended conversations, Dennett and Caruso present their arguments for and against the existence of free will and debate their implications. Dennett argues that the kind of free will required for moral responsibility is compatible with determinism – for him, self-control is key; we are not responsible for becoming responsible, but are responsible for staying responsible, for keeping would-be puppeteers at bay. Caruso takes the opposite view, arguing that who we are and what we do is ultimately the result of factors beyond our control, and because of this we are never morally responsible for our actions in the sense that would make us truly deserving of blame and praise, punishment and reward. Just Deserts introduces the concepts central to the debate about free will and moral responsibility by way of an entertaining, rigorous, and sometimes heated philosophical dialogue between two leading thinkers.


Freedom Without Responsibility

Freedom Without Responsibility
Author: Bruce N. Waller
Publisher:
Total Pages: 236
Release: 1990
Genre: Philosophy
ISBN: 9780877227175

Download Freedom Without Responsibility Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

In this book, Bruce Waller attacks two prevalent philosophical beliefs. First, he argues that moral responsibility must be rejected; there is no room for such a notion within our naturalist framework. Second, he denies the common assumption that moral responsibility is inseparably linked with individual freedom. Rejection of moral responsibility does not entail the demise of individual freedom; instead, individual freedom is enhanced by the rejection of moral responsibility. According to this theory of "no-fault naturalism," no one deserves either blame or reward.In the course of arguing against moral responsibility, Waller critiques major compatibilist arguments-by Dennett, Frankfurt, Strawson, Bennett, Wolf, Hampshire, Glover, Rachels, Sher, and others. In addition, the implications of denying moral responsibility-for individual freedom, for moral judgments and moral behavior, and for social justice-are examined; the supposed dire consequences of the denial of moral responsibility are challenged; and the benefits of denying moral responsibility are described. Author note: Bruce N. Waller, Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Youngstown State University, Youngstown, Ohio, is the author of Critical Thinking: Consider the Verdict.


Building Better Beings

Building Better Beings
Author: Manuel Vargas
Publisher: OUP Oxford
Total Pages: 360
Release: 2013-01-17
Genre: Philosophy
ISBN: 0191043664

Download Building Better Beings Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

Building Better Beings presents a new theory of moral responsibility. Beginning with a discussion of ordinary convictions about responsibility and free will and their implications for a philosophical theory, Manuel Vargas argues that no theory can do justice to all the things we want from a theory of free will and moral responsibility. He goes on to show how we can nevertheless justify our responsibility practices and provide a normatively and naturalistically adequate account of of responsible agency, blame, and desert. Three ideas are central to Vargas' account: the agency cultivation model, circumstantialism about powers, and revisionism about responsibility and free will. On Vargas' account, responsibility norms and practices are justified by their effects. In particular, the agency cultivation model holds that responsibility practices help mold us into creatures that respond to moral considerations. Moreover, the abilities that matter for responsibility and free will are not metaphysically prior features of agents in isolation from social contexts. Instead, they are functions of both agents and their normatively structured contexts. This is the idea of circumstantialism about the powers required for responsibility. Third, Vargas argues that an adequate theory of responsibility will be revisionist, or at odds with important strands of ordinary convictions about free will and moral responsibility. Building Better Beings provides a compelling and state-of-the-art defense of moral responsibility in the face of growing philosophical and scientific skepticism about free will and moral responsibility.


Rethinking Responsibility

Rethinking Responsibility
Author: K. E. Boxer
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Total Pages: 191
Release: 2013-02-07
Genre: Philosophy
ISBN: 0199695326

Download Rethinking Responsibility Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle

K. E. Boxer explores moral responsibility, and whether it is compatible with causal determinism. She suggests that to answer this question we must focus on responsibility in the sense of liability, and that an incompatibilist view may only be preserved on an understanding of the moral desert of punishment that many find morally problematic.