Epitome And Analysis Of Savignys Treatise On Obligations In Roman Law PDF Download

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1872 edition. Excerpt: ... discretionary power of selection or of otherwise acting as an agent proper, and in that way he would shade off into the Procurator or Representative proper, while still continuing a nuncius merely: And thus the Procurator and the Nuncius may equally be the instruments or agents of a principal: The true distinction in questions of representation is, therefore, not one of words merely, that is to say, not the distinction between the Nuncius and the Procurator; but it is rather of the following nature, that is to say, --1. Does the agent (whether nuncius or procurator) treat in the name of his Principal? or, 2. Does he treat in his own name? In the former case, the actions pass to and against the principal directly and do not affect the agent at all; whereas, in the latter case, the actions pass to and against the agent directly, and only pass to and against the principal by cession (forced ou feinte): The distinction now taken is indicated in the following phrase, --"Actio ad exemplum institoriae actionis. This action was an extension and generalization of the institoria actio." The following texts also bear out the same distinction, namely, --1. Dig. 16. 3. 1. 11Si te rogavero, ut rem meam perferas ad Titium ut is eam servet, qua actione tecum experiri possum, apud Pomponium quaeritur. Et putat, tecum mandati; cum eo vero qui eas res receperit, depositi. Si vero tuo nomine receperit, tu quidem mihi mandati teneris, ille tibi depositi; quam actionem mihi praestabis, mandati judicio conventus." Here the nuncius, so far as he is such, is a mere colourless medium, and the principal has a direct action. 2. Dig. 19. 1. 13. 25: "Si procurator vendiderit et caverit emtori, quaeritur an domino vel adversus dominum...