2004 05 Performance Year Ratings Impacting Fiscal Year 2005 06 University Of South Carolina Union Sector Two Year Institutions PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download 2004 05 Performance Year Ratings Impacting Fiscal Year 2005 06 University Of South Carolina Union Sector Two Year Institutions PDF full book. Access full book title 2004 05 Performance Year Ratings Impacting Fiscal Year 2005 06 University Of South Carolina Union Sector Two Year Institutions.
| Author | : South Carolina Commission on Higher Education, Columbia |
| Publisher | : |
| Total Pages | : 4 |
| Release | : 2005 |
| Genre | : |
| ISBN | : |
Download 2004-05 Performance Year Ratings Impacting Fiscal Year 2005-06. University of South Carolina Union. Sector: Two-Year Institutions Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle
This series of documents contains performance scoring information for 2004-2005 for individual institutions of higher education in South Carolina. This information is used in establishing 2005-2006 fiscal year allocations. Data includes: (1) Degrees Awarded; (2) Enrollment; (3) Average SAT score; (4) Faculty; (5) Tuition; and (6) Financial revenue. Evaluative scores are provided based on: (1) Mission Focus; (2) Quality of Faculty; (3) Classroom Quality; (4) Institutional Cooperation and Collaboration; (5) Administrative Efficiency; (6) Entrance Requirements; (7) Graduate Achievement; (8) User-Friendliness of the Institution; and (9) Research Funding. Scoring interpretation is provided. Based on a 3.0 maximum possible score, the University of South Carolina Union scored 2.40 (80 percent), achieving standard performance level.
| Author | : South Carolina Commission on Higher Education, Columbia |
| Publisher | : |
| Total Pages | : 4 |
| Release | : 2005 |
| Genre | : |
| ISBN | : |
Download 2004-05 Performance Year Ratings Impacting Fiscal Year 2005-06. University of South Carolina Columbia. Sector Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle
This series of documents contains performance scoring information for 2004-2005 for individual institutions of higher education in South Carolina. This information is used in establishing 2005-2006 fiscal year allocations. Data includes: (1) Degrees Awarded; (2) Enrollment; (3) Average SAT score; (4) Faculty; (5) Tuition; and (6) Financial revenue. Evaluative scores are provided based on: (1) Mission Focus; (2) Quality of Faculty; (3) Classroom Quality; (4) Institutional Cooperation and Collaboration; (5) Administrative Efficiency; (6) Entrance Requirements; (7) Graduate Achievement; (8) User-Friendliness of the Institution; and (9) Research Funding. Scoring interpretation is provided. Based on a 3.0 maximum possible score, the University of South Carolina Columbia scored 2.85 (95 percent), substantially exceeding standard performance level.
| Author | : South Carolina Commission on Higher Education, Columbia |
| Publisher | : |
| Total Pages | : 4 |
| Release | : 2005 |
| Genre | : |
| ISBN | : |
Download 2004-05 Performance Year Ratings Impacting Fiscal Year 2005-06. University of South Carolina Aiken. Sector Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle
This series of documents contains performance scoring information for 2004-2005 for individual institutions of higher education in South Carolina. This information is used in establishing 2005-2006 fiscal year allocations. Data includes: (1) Degrees Awarded; (2) Enrollment; (3) Average SAT score; (4) Faculty; (5) Tuition; and (6) Financial revenue. Evaluative scores are provided based on: (1) Mission Focus; (2) Quality of Faculty; (3) Classroom Quality; (4) Institutional Cooperation and Collaboration; (5) Administrative Efficiency; (6) Entrance Requirements; (7) Graduate Achievement; (8) User-Friendliness of the Institution; and (9) Research Funding. Scoring interpretation is provided. Based on a 3.0 maximum possible score, the University of South Carolina Aiken scored 2.53 (84 percent), achieving standard performance level.
| Author | : South Carolina Commission on Higher Education, Columbia |
| Publisher | : |
| Total Pages | : 4 |
| Release | : 2005 |
| Genre | : |
| ISBN | : |
Download 2004-05 Performance Year Ratings Impacting Fiscal Year 2005-06. University of South Carolina Beaufort. Sector Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle
This series of documents contains performance scoring information for 2004-2005 for individual institutions of higher education in South Carolina. This information is used in establishing 2005-2006 fiscal year allocations. Data includes: (1) Degrees Awarded; (2) Enrollment; (3) Average SAT score; (4) Faculty; (5) Tuition; and (6) Financial revenue. Evaluative scores are provided based on: (1) Mission Focus; (2) Quality of Faculty; (3) Classroom Quality; (4) Institutional Cooperation and Collaboration; (5) Administrative Efficiency; (6) Entrance Requirements; (7) Graduate Achievement; (8) User-Friendliness of the Institution; and (9) Research Funding. Scoring interpretation is provided. Based on a 3.0 maximum possible score, the University of South Carolina Beaufort scored 2.45 (82 percent), achieving standard performance level.
| Author | : South Carolina Commission on Higher Education, Columbia |
| Publisher | : |
| Total Pages | : 4 |
| Release | : 2005 |
| Genre | : |
| ISBN | : |
Download 2004-05 Performance Year Ratings Impacting Fiscal Year 2005-06. University of South Carolina Upstate. Sector Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle
This series of documents contains performance scoring information for 2004-2005 for individual institutions of higher education in South Carolina. This information is used in establishing 2005-2006 fiscal year allocations. Data includes: (1) Degrees Awarded; (2) Enrollment; (3) Average SAT score; (4) Faculty; (5) Tuition; and (6) Financial revenue. Evaluative scores are provided based on: (1) Mission Focus; (2) Quality of Faculty; (3) Classroom Quality; (4) Institutional Cooperation and Collaboration; (5) Administrative Efficiency; (6) Entrance Requirements; (7) Graduate Achievement; (8) User-Friendliness of the Institution; and (9) Research Funding. Scoring interpretation is provided. Based on a 3.0 maximum possible score, the University of South Carolina Upstate scored 2.49 (83 percent), achieving standard performance level.
| Author | : South Carolina Commission on Higher Education, Columbia |
| Publisher | : |
| Total Pages | : 4 |
| Release | : 2005 |
| Genre | : |
| ISBN | : |
Download 2004-05 Performance Year Ratings Impacting Fiscal Year 2005-06. Medical University of South Carolina. Sector Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle
This series of documents contains performance scoring information for 2004-2005 for individual institutions of higher education in South Carolina. This information is used in establishing 2005-2006 fiscal year allocations. Data includes: (1) Degrees Awarded; (2) Enrollment; (3) Average SAT score; (4) Faculty; (5) Tuition; and (6) Financial revenue. Evaluative scores are provided based on: (1) Mission Focus; (2) Quality of Faculty; (3) Classroom Quality; (4) Institutional Cooperation and Collaboration; (5) Administrative Efficiency; (6) Entrance Requirements; (7) Graduate Achievement; (8) User-Friendliness of the Institution; and (9) Research Funding. Scoring interpretation is provided. Based on a 3.0 maximum possible score, the Medical University of South Carolina scored 2.81 (94 percent), exceeding standard performance level.
| Author | : South Carolina Commission on Higher Education, Columbia |
| Publisher | : |
| Total Pages | : 4 |
| Release | : 2005 |
| Genre | : |
| ISBN | : |
Download 2004-05 Performance Year Ratings Impacting Fiscal Year 2005-06. South Carolina State University. Sector Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle
This series of documents contains performance scoring information for 2004-2005 for individual institutions of higher education in South Carolina. This information is used in establishing 2005-2006 fiscal year allocations. Data includes: (1) Degrees Awarded; (2) Enrollment; (3) Average SAT score; (4) Faculty; (5) Tuition; and (6) Financial revenue. Evaluative scores are provided based on: (1) Mission Focus; (2) Quality of Faculty; (3) Classroom Quality; (4) Institutional Cooperation and Collaboration; (5) Administrative Efficiency; (6) Entrance Requirements; (7) Graduate Achievement; (8) User-Friendliness of the Institution; and (9) Research Funding. Scoring interpretation is provided. Based on a 3.0 maximum possible score, South Carolina University scored 2.35 (78 percent), achieving standard performance level.
| Author | : South Carolina Commission on Higher Education, Columbia |
| Publisher | : |
| Total Pages | : 4 |
| Release | : 2005 |
| Genre | : |
| ISBN | : |
Download 2004-05 Performance Year Ratings Impacting Fiscal Year 2005-06. Clemson University. Sector Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle
This series of documents contains performance scoring information for 2004-2005 for individual institutions of higher education in South Carolina. This information is used in establishing 2005-2006 fiscal year allocations. Data includes: (1) Degrees Awarded; (2) Enrollment; (3) Average SAT score; (4) Faculty; (5) Tuition; and (6) Financial revenue. Evaluative scores are provided based on: (1) Mission Focus; (2) Quality of Faculty; (3) Classroom Quality; (4) Institutional Cooperation and Collaboration; (5) Administrative Efficiency; (6) Entrance Requirements; (7) Graduate Achievement; (8) User-Friendliness of the Institution; and (9) Research Funding. Scoring interpretation is provided. Based on a 3.0 maximum possible score, Clemson University scored 2.80 (93 percent), exceeding standard performance level.
| Author | : South Carolina Commission on Higher Education, Columbia |
| Publisher | : |
| Total Pages | : 4 |
| Release | : 2005 |
| Genre | : |
| ISBN | : |
Download 2004-05 Performance Year Ratings Impacting Fiscal Year 2005-06. University of South Carolina Sumter. Sector: Two-Year Institutions Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle
This series of documents contains performance scoring information for 2004-2005 for individual institutions of higher education in South Carolina. This information is used in establishing 2005-2006 fiscal year allocations. Data includes: (1) Degrees Awarded; (2) Enrollment; (3) Average SAT score; (4) Faculty; (5) Tuition; and (6) Financial revenue. Evaluative scores are provided based on: (1) Mission Focus; (2) Quality of Faculty; (3) Classroom Quality; (4) Institutional Cooperation and Collaboration; (5) Administrative Efficiency; (6) Entrance Requirements; (7) Graduate Achievement; (8) User-Friendliness of the Institution; and (9) Research Funding. Scoring interpretation is provided. Based on a 3.0 maximum possible score, the University of South Carolina Sumter scored 2.77 (92 percent), exceeding standard performance level.
| Author | : South Carolina Commission on Higher Education, Columbia |
| Publisher | : |
| Total Pages | : 4 |
| Release | : 2005 |
| Genre | : |
| ISBN | : |
Download 2004-05 Performance Year Ratings Impacting Fiscal Year 2005-06. Winthrop University. Sector Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle
This series of documents contains performance scoring information for 2004-2005 for individual institutions of higher education in South Carolina. This information is used in establishing 2005-2006 fiscal year allocations. Data includes: (1) Degrees Awarded; (2) Enrollment; (3) Average SAT score; (4) Faculty; (5) Tuition; and (6) Financial revenue. Evaluative scores are provided based on: (1) Mission Focus; (2) Quality of Faculty; (3) Classroom Quality; (4) Institutional Cooperation and Collaboration; (5) Administrative Efficiency; (6) Entrance Requirements; (7) Graduate Achievement; (8) User-Friendliness of the Institution; and (9) Research Funding. Scoring interpretation is provided. Based on a 3.0 maximum possible score, Winthrop University scored 2.88 (96 percent), substantially exceeding standard performance level.
